Microsoft Dynamics NAV

Forum Post: RE: NAV 8

Jens Glathe — Mon, 20 May 2013 16:00:00 GMT

Strange, isn't it? ;-)

with best regards

Jens

Blog Post: SharePoint 2013 Outlook Calendar Integration

Ash Chandler — Mon, 20 May 2013 14:30:00 GMT

Microsoft SharePoint® 2013 Calendar Integration with Microsoft Outlook®

Two way SharePoint and Outlook calendar integration is still a great feature with SharePoint 2013. The feature has been around in a previous version of SharePoint, but I thought it was worth re-visiting it briefly for any new adopters of SharePoint 2013.

To connect your SharePoint 2013 calendar to Outlook (in this example I am connecting to Outlook 2010) all you have to do is click the ‘Connect to Outlook’ button in the Calendar ribbon.

You will then be prompted by Internet Explorer to allow the connection.

Click ‘Allow’. Then Outlook will ask you to confirm the connection too.

Click ‘Yes’. Outlook will then present the SharePoint 2013 calendar just like any other outlook calendar.

You can now work with the calendar from either Outlook or SharePoint and all your changes will be automatically synchronised between the two. For example, add an appointment in Outlook...

...and it will automatically appear in the SharePoint calendar.

Likewise, any changes you or anyone else makes to the calendar from SharePoint will appear back in Outlook.

By connecting your SharePoint 2013 calendars to Outlook you can use the familiar and powerful Outlook calendar tools for keeping your calendar up to date. You can also view a SharePoint calendar side by side with an Outlook calendar or view it as an overlay. You can even copy events among SharePoint and Outlook calendars, without leaving Outlook.

Forum Post: RE: Standard Cost update

Ian Fletcher — Mon, 20 May 2013 13:40:00 GMT

I'm an end user, You need to modify CU5812 - Calculate Standard Cost. - this does does not mean much to me, what has to be modified?

Forum Post: RE: Dynamic Nav MS BI Tools and Database & Support after implementation

Sathish K — Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:00 GMT

Dear HATEM,, Please write me on sathish.k@asmltd.com,,

Blog Post: Connector for Microsoft Dynamics - integrating CRM with NAV5!

Ash Chandler — Mon, 20 May 2013 13:05:00 GMT

Connector for Microsoft Dynamics - Integrating CRM with NAV5!

The Dynamics Connector, despite its usability issues, is starting to gather a little momentum, due mainly to its flexibility and price tag. As the Connectors popularity grows, it is inevitable that you will sooner or later come up against something that it really was not designed to do, in my case this was to integrate with a version of Microsoft Dynamics® NAV prior to NAV 2009 or more specifically in this instance - NAV 5 but the same principles would apply to older NAV versions although with a little more work to get the Pages to fit.

You still need to be running the Dynamics NAV 2009 R2 client and middle tier as it is this that provides the architecture for the Connector to communicate with the Dynamics NAV data but providing you are up to date with your enhancement (BREP), or at least were at the time that NAV 2009 was released, then this is an FOC update and just requires installation of the new client and setup of the middle tiers. You then have a handful of Pages, a couple of Codeunits, an XMLPort, Form and Table or 2 to copy across as well as a few carefully chosen bits of code and you’re then pretty much ready to go.

Of course, you could just upgrade to NAV 2009 R2 or NAV 2013, click the enable connector checkbox and save the trouble and this is definitely the recommended (and supported) route, but if you don’t have the time or money for an upgrade or don’t see any other benefits for your business, then this is at least an option and should cost you no more than a couple of days of consultancy to get the Connector running maps against your old version of NAV.

Forum Post: RE: Using add-on EasyPDF with NAV

Helena Nunes — Mon, 20 May 2013 10:59:00 GMT

Hi Richard,

Many thanks for your answer.

We have already seen a demo and already have quotes for this software. I just wanted to collect some impressions on its usage to help us decide.

Blog Post: mllorcag: Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013 - Novedades en Supply...

Miguel Llorca — Mon, 20 May 2013 09:56:00 GMT

mllorcag:

Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013 - Novedades en Supply Chain: Ensamblado y Vistas de Inventario:

Presentamos las novedades dentro de SCM (gestión de la cadena de suministro) en NAV 2013. Las nuevas vistas de inventario y la funcionalidad de “Ensamblado”, aplicable a gran cantidad de escenarios y muy demandada por los usuarios.

Forum Post: RE: Wrong Production Order

Neville Foyn — Mon, 20 May 2013 09:22:00 GMT

The reason for this is that when you post consumption against a production order the system transfers the cost of the RAW materials into Production - Work In Progress, then when you post output the system transfers the total value of the raw materials from WIP into Inventory

The reason why the system wont let you remove the order without posting output is that these values will be left behind in the WIP,

What you need to do is post an output of 1 and then finish the production order, Run the adjust cost after finishing the production order to ensure the costs are fully updated, you can then negatively adjust the 1 qty out of stock

Cheers

Nev

Forum Post: RE: Warehouse UOM Conversion

Neville Foyn — Mon, 20 May 2013 04:10:00 GMT

There is also a field on the warehousing tab of the item card with "Put Away Unit of Measure"

Setting this to pallets had the system take the units and place the pallets line with the conversion happening automaticlly

Forum Post: RE: Explicit Deny in NAV

Aleksandar Totovic — Sun, 19 May 2013 21:33:00 GMT

Doesn't matter NAV2009 or NAV2013 or some older versions. Is all the same, Explicit Deny does'n exist. What will happen in the future, we'll see.

Maybe someone has information.

Forum Post: RE: Wrong Item Price

Aleksandar Totovic — Sun, 19 May 2013 14:08:00 GMT

There is no automation. When you input new sales price from new starting date, you need to put Ending Date, necessarily.

You can make some customization about closing price period when you input new start date, but this is not a standard in NAV.

Forum Post: RE: Data Validation

Aleksandar Totovic — Sat, 18 May 2013 23:44:00 GMT

What data validation? Please describe problem in more detail. I worked just litle with LS, but I will ask my colleagues.

Forum Post: RE: FA inventory

Aless — Sat, 18 May 2013 23:40:00 GMT

Thanks

Blog Post: Retiring NavigateIntoSuccess.com

Vjeko — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:02:00 GMT

A couple of months ago, when I asked my friends on Facebook and Twitter if anybody knows how to move a WordPress blog to another domain, everybody said that I was crazy. You don’t do these things, they said. And yet, when they heard the reason why I was about to leave my old domain, everybody agreed.

NavigateIntoSucess.com has served me well. I moved my public WordPress website to this custom domain very early on. It has become a kind of a brand. But it is a pretty long name. You can easily mistype it. It’s difficult to remember it if you only occasionally stumble upon it. It doesn’t at all relate to me as a living person behind it. So I decided to move it all to a fresh new domain: vjeko.com.

NAV community is a live and vibrant one, and through my blog, a book, and other activities, I’ve met a lot of great people who all simply know me as “Vjeko”. It’s short. It was unusual enough that I managed to snitch the .com domain fairly early. And even though for most people I met, at first my Slavic name proved to be scary, unmemorable, and utterly unpronounceable (especially for my American friends who all still twist their tongues around pronouncing the hard “j” instead of simply “y” as it should be done), I’m pretty sure that strongly coupling my blog with my personal moniker will prove to be a smart thing in the long run.

So – I welcome you to vjeko.com, my new domain, and I hope that I find enough time to transform the to-do list I accumulated while working on the new blog into actual posts soon. Stay tuned, and hey – tell me what you think about this move!

Read this post at its original location at http://vjeko.com/blog/retiring-navigateintosuccess-com, or visit the original blog at http://vjeko.com. 5e33c5f6cb90c441bd1f23d5b9eeca34

Forum Post: RE: New to NAV: Regarding Outlook 32/64 -bit to integrate add-in.

Mohana Yadav — Sat, 18 May 2013 16:03:00 GMT

Yes,

NAV2013 Outlook Synchronization supports only 32-bit office

mohana-dynamicsnav.blogspot.in/.../microsoft-dynamics-nav-2009-r2-and.html

Forum Post: RE: Production Order refresh

bosovik — Sat, 18 May 2013 13:51:00 GMT

Finally. Thanks a lot.

Forum Post: RE: Include Inventory

Aleksandar Totovic — Sat, 18 May 2013 11:57:00 GMT

If you mark this field (only when Reordering Policy is Lot-for-Lot), inventory calculate the need for replenishment orders, will include inventory in the projected available balance:

Inventory + Qty. on Purch. Order + Qty. on Prod. Order - Qty. on Sales Order - Qty. on Component Lines

If you unmark this field, inventory calculation will be:

Qty. on Purch. Order + Qty. on Prod. Order - Qty. on Sales Order - Qty. on Component Lines

Forum Post: RE: Correct wrong unit cost from purchasing how

Aleksandar Totovic — Sat, 18 May 2013 11:17:00 GMT

To be sure, you can open Average Cost Calc. Overview form (from Unit Cost field) and see that Actual Cost and Expected Cost are zero in this case. From this form, you can go on Item Ledger Entry...

It is (value en Unit Cost) not related with GL entry.

This value will be only suggested by NAV if you try to post some Item Journal with Positive Adjmt. e.g. or something else. Of course, you can shange this future value on journal.

Forum Post: RE: Field User ID of G/L Entries and the other entries is not correct.

Neville Foyn — Sat, 18 May 2013 06:05:00 GMT

Happy to help, good luck with the rest of your project

Forum Post: RE: Number of report executed

Mohana Yadav — Sat, 18 May 2013 03:07:00 GMT

You can try this too

blogs.msdn.com/.../how-to-log-report-usage.aspx