Thank you so much André, for the quick response/support!!
This is really helpful and clarified the distinction between the top and bottom sections of the posting profile.
Based on your explanation, I took another look at our setup.
I noticed that within the Disposal (bottom) section, all of our post value types (depreciation, acquisition, adjustments, etc.) are currently mapped using the same main and offset accounts. It sounds like this may be the root cause of why we’re not seeing a clear breakout of asset cost, accumulated depreciation, and gain/loss in the voucher.
There also does not appear to be a specific mapping defined for Net book value, which seems to be a key piece in driving the gain/loss behavior.
I’ve included a screenshot for reference
One thing I noticed when comparing to your example is that your configuration includes multiple books, whereas this setup reflects a single book (SLFM) used across all assets.
I understand this can vary depending on overall design and business needs, but I wanted to confirm...Does having a single book impact how the Disposal (bottom grid) should be configured, or would the same best practice approach still apply regardless?
As a next step, I’m planning to update the disposal configuration so that:
- Depreciation-related post values reverse between accumulated depreciation and asset accounts
- Net book value is mapped to flow from the asset account to the gain/loss account
Before making those changes, I just wanted to confirm that this approach aligns with best practice.
Thank you again!!
