*This post is locked for comments
*This post is locked for comments
We do occasionally know (correction) that it happens.
Ed,
The bottom line answer is that we don't know why they two records would be different. In a single currency database, you almost never see the values in the curyacct table and so really don't know when or how it goes wrong.
We do occasionally now that it happens because in Cash Manager >Bank Rec, the GL balance is from the Curyacct table. Once in a while it displays the incorrect balance so we know that the curyacct record is incorrect. But we have never discovered what causes this.
Thank you for your help, I will look into the article when it is available. But the rounding error you are speaking of cannot be what I am seeing, I would understand if it was a few dollars off considering there are no more than 200 to 300 transactions in a period per account/subaccount. The difference between periods its between $100's-$10,000+ dollars off and way over $100,000+ between some years. The beginning of the issue started back in 2004 in some cases (which is before they switched over to SL2011 from 7.0, they did this early 2013) and aggressively got worse between 2011 and 2012.
Hi Ed,
We do this see when converting the data to MR. I really can't say why they would be different other than we know that curyacct sometimes carries floating point values that would round to zero whereas the accthist record is not created upon year end close if the balance is zero. But we do see variances when running Diagnostics scripts for MR conversion.
See KB 2931999 for some scripts to find the variances and to fix them. This article is being published but I don't find it available yet but should be soon.
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing. You can also customize your in-app and email Notification settings across all subscriptions.
André Arnaud de Cal... 291,280 Super User 2024 Season 2
Martin Dráb 230,214 Most Valuable Professional
nmaenpaa 101,156