web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :

Beyond Risk Registers: Turning Uncertainty into Advantage in ERP with B. Central

EDUARDO PACHERRES LUJÁN Profile Picture EDUARDO PACHERRES L...



In many ERP projects, risk management is reduced to a formal register: a list of probabilities, impacts, and owners. While useful, this approach often remains on paper and fails to influence the project’s most critical decisions. Risks are documented, but not actively managed.

Modern risk management goes further. It transforms uncertainty into a driver of strategic decisions.


The Problem with the Traditional Approach

  • Risks are logged in matrices or heat maps.

  • They are reviewed in committees but rarely integrated into the timeline or budget.

  • Key decisions (scope, architecture, go‑live dates) are often taken before uncertainty is properly analysed.

Risk management becomes a compliance exercise rather than genuine project support.


The Modern Approach: Risks as Competitive Advantage


1. Scenario Simulation Before Decisions
- Example: before fixing the go‑live date, simulate what happens if data migration takes 50% longer.
- Buffers and resources can then be allocated with precision, not generically.

2. Smart Buffers Linked to Decisions
- Buffers are not added “just in case” but justified by specific scenarios.
- Example: “If user acceptance testing reveals gaps, we need a 3‑day buffer to address them.”

3. Transparent Financial Conversation
- The CFO or the Project Manager receives scenarios, not surprises: “Across three simulations, this buffer protects the testing phase and avoids a £20,000 productivity loss.”

4. Risks as Strategic Compass
- Rather than blocking decisions, risks guide the project towards stronger options.
- Uncertainty becomes an input for planning, not an obstacle.


Practical Examples in Business Central

  • Data Migration with Budget Scenarios: simulate a 50% delay and calculate the cost of extra consultancy and licences.

  • User Testing with Dimensions: assign buffer costs directly to the responsible department, avoiding dilution in the overall budget.

  • Manufacturing Projects: add a 5‑day buffer in production route setup; Business Central shows the cost impact versus potential plant downtime.

  • Sales Growth Simulation: apply a 10% factor to income lines post go‑live to test whether support buffers are sufficient.

  • Power BI Integration: visualise three timelines (optimistic, probable, adverse) with buffer costs, making risk impact clear to finance leadership.


To conclude:

In Business Central, risk management must evolve beyond registers and compliance. Modern practices such as scenario simulation, cost dimension analysis, transparent financial conversations, and real‑time lessons learned transform risks from static entries into dynamic inputs for decision‑making. By integrating uncertainty into project design from the outset, organisations turn risk into a strategic compass that guides stronger choices, safeguards budgets, and drives ERP success.

Comments