web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Small and medium business | Business Central, N...
Answered

Bug in validation of Vendor Contract Line Subpage (8078, ListPart) SaaS BC 26.5

(7) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 293

Dear community,

I found a potential issue in the Vendor Subscription Contract – Lines page.

On the lines, there are three predefined Type options: Comment, Item, and G/L Account.

However, when selecting Type = Comment, the system unexpectedly tries to validate the table Item, which triggers the following error (see screenshot below):

 
 

Could someone please confirm if the same behavior occurs in your SaaS environment as well?

It looks like the system is incorrectly validating the “Comment” type as if it were an “Item” type.

 

Thank you in advance!

I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    Teagen Boll Profile Picture
    1,376 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at
    I tested this in a SAAS v26.4 environment and there is the same error. The No. field runs validation on the default Type (Item). This module is also quite new and was added recently so Microsoft may have to change how validation works if Type = Comment. The error message should be changed because it is a bit missleading.
     
    To avoid the error you would not enter the No. field, you would enter a description in the Subscription Description and/or Line Description fields:
     
  • Verified answer
    YUN ZHU Profile Picture
    99,055 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at
    Hi, This is indeed an issue. However, if the Type is "Comment," you can directly input the Subscription Description. For now, this is the only way to work around it.
     
    Thanks.
    ZHU
  • Verified answer
    OussamaSabbouh Profile Picture
    12,766 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at
    Hello,
    Yes, it’s a bug, when Type = Comment, BC wrongly validates the Item No. field. Test it in a clean sandbox; if it still happens, report it to Microsoft as a subscription billing defect.
     
    Regards,
    Oussama Sabbouh
  • Verified answer
    TarikJerkovich Profile Picture
    293 on at
    Thanks all for answers and confirmation.
    As I learned comment need to validate table Standard text code-7.
  • Suggested answer
    Sumit Singh Profile Picture
    11,757 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at
    Hi, 
     
    This looks like a bug in the Subscription & Recurring Billing area. When a line’s Type = Comment, the No. field should not validate against Items;  a Comment line’s No. behaves like a Standard Text Code selector (or you just use Description as already mentioned by YUN), so invoking Item validation is inconsistent with expected behavior.
     
    Reporting this to Microsoft as a subscription billing defect is the right call as per me.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Stars!

Congratulations to our 2025 Community Spotlights

Thanks to all of our 2025 Community Spotlight stars!

Leaderboard > Small and medium business | Business Central, NAV, RMS

#1
OussamaSabbouh Profile Picture

OussamaSabbouh 1,804 Super User 2026 Season 1

#2
YUN ZHU Profile Picture

YUN ZHU 1,103 Super User 2026 Season 1

#3
Kamal Khakhkhar Profile Picture

Kamal Khakhkhar 695

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans