Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Dynamics 365 Community / Forums / Supply chain | Supply Chain Management, Commerce / Question of renewal as...
Supply chain | Supply Chain Management, Commerce
Answered

Question of renewal assessment MS Functional Associate

(1) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by Markus Kreuter 63
I am currently doing my renewal assessment. I got the following question:
 
The answer options are the following:
  • 20
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 40

Can someone explain and elaborate the solution?

 
  • Markus Kreuter Profile Picture
    Markus Kreuter 63 on at
    Question of renewal assessment MS Functional Associate
    Hi Andre,
    I continued the exam and finished, but they only show the overall result. So I have no clue what might be the official MS answer.
  • André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture
    André Arnaud de Cal... 292,494 Super User 2025 Season 1 on at
    Question of renewal assessment MS Functional Associate
    Markus,

    Did you continue with the assessment? What was the correct answer according to the test outcome? I'm just curious....
  • Markus Kreuter Profile Picture
    Markus Kreuter 63 on at
    Question of renewal assessment MS Functional Associate
    @Andre, yes, this is comming from the official MS Renewal assessment. I have the feeling that something is missing or was set wrong in the question, because, as you mentioned, there is no relation with allowing for a negative inventory. My answer would also have been 39 but since it is not an option I was wondering if I miss something completely. That's why I raised the question in the community forum.
    Anyway, I officially send a request to MS and asked for investigation of this question.
     
  • Verified answer
    André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture
    André Arnaud de Cal... 292,494 Super User 2025 Season 1 on at
    Question of renewal assessment MS Functional Associate
    Hi Markus,
     
    This is a quite ridiculous assessment question. Is this coming from a Microsoft-offered assessment? I don't see the relation here with allowing for a negative inventory. Coverage per location is also not common. 
    In case the quantity is below the minimum, it will propose a reorder quantity to the maximum. Say, it is indeed a coverage per location, I would expect (but never tried) 20 for location A and 19 for location B. Total 39, but this is not an answer option. In case it is a coverage per warehouse, then the quantity is 21 which is above the minimum.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Announcing Our 2025 Season 1 Super Users!

A new season of Super Users has arrived, and we are so grateful for the daily…

Vahid Ghafarpour – Community Spotlight

We are excited to recognize Vahid Ghafarpour as our February 2025 Community…

Tip: Become a User Group leader!

Join the ranks of valued community UG leaders

Leaderboard

#1
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 292,494 Super User 2025 Season 1

#2
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 231,305 Most Valuable Professional

#3
nmaenpaa Profile Picture

nmaenpaa 101,156

Leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans