You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
Testing with the CDA product and GP2015. The GL pre and post Trial Balances are matching as expected with several years of archival processing.
Overall happy with functionality of CDA.
The interesting situation is pre and post Accounts Receivable HATB reports do not match up.
Upon researching, we found the A/R HATB reports appears to miss all customers which are considered child customers to a parent/corporate/national account customer. Understandably the apply chain logic will affect what is brought over or not but trying to make sense of how the national/child aspect of document chains is managed with CDA.
Our company MS partner is working with ProfAd (vendor) on the question as to what is happening but we have
not received response yet.
Wondering if other users of CDA have this challenge.
Thanks.
*This post is locked for comments
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing. You can also customize your in-app and email Notification settings across all subscriptions.
#1
André Arnaud de Cal...
291,240
Super User 2024 Season 2
#2
Martin Dráb
230,149
Most Valuable Professional
#3
nmaenpaa
101,156
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (