You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
Testing with the CDA product and GP2015. The GL pre and post Trial Balances are matching as expected with several years of archival processing.
Overall happy with functionality of CDA.
The interesting situation is pre and post Accounts Receivable HATB reports do not match up.
Upon researching, we found the A/R HATB reports appears to miss all customers which are considered child customers to a parent/corporate/national account customer. Understandably the apply chain logic will affect what is brought over or not but trying to make sense of how the national/child aspect of document chains is managed with CDA.
Our company MS partner is working with ProfAd (vendor) on the question as to what is happening but we have
not received response yet.
Wondering if other users of CDA have this challenge.
Thanks.
*This post is locked for comments
I have the same question (0)
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (