Hi CU23100638-0,
1) Issue
- Batch production scenario with multiple phases (operations) executed via Production Floor Execution (PFE)
- Materials are defined in the formula but not linked to specific operations
Observed behavior in the provided screenshots:
- In PFE job list: multiple operations (10, 20, 30, etc.) are shown with Started = 0.00 and Completed = 0.00, confirming the order was not properly started before execution
- Materials are initialized only in the first job but not in subsequent phases
- System requires entering full quantity (e.g., 100 kg) already in the first phase (as shown in the PFE screen)
- Route transactions show multiple “Quantity = 100” postings per operation, even for early phases
- Production order remains “Started” and does not transition to “Reported as finished”
- Work instructions button in PFE (visible in screenshot on the right panel) is disabled / greyed out, even though notes exist on route
2) Reason
Material consumption behavior:
- Since formula lines are not linked to operations, the system:
- Initializes all materials at first job only
- Does not trigger them in later operations
- This explains why later phases require manual entry
Quantity behavior (confirmed in screenshots):
- In PFE, the entered quantity (e.g., 100 kg):
- Represents throughput quantity across operations, not finished goods
- The repeated “Quantity = 100” route journal entries per operation (visible in route transactions screenshot) indicate:
- Each operation processed the same batch quantity
- Not that physical production occurred at that stage
Production order status:
- The PFE job list clearly shows Started = 0.00, meaning:
- The production order was not started via standard “Start” process or auto-start configuration
- Because of that:
- RAF validation fails later (cannot report > started quantity)
PFE flow logic:
- Completing last job does not trigger:
- Report as finished (RAF) automatically
- This is separate by design
Work instructions:
- The screenshot shows:
- Route has a simple Note (“Important: Dry Vessel”)
- However, PFE only enables the Instructions button if:
- Proper “Production Floor Execution instructions framework” is used
- Notes alone do not activate instructions
3) Resolution
Material consumption setup:
- Link formula/BOM lines to operations:
- Assign Operation number on each line
- Define correct Flushing principle (Start / Finish / Manual)
- This ensures:
- Materials are initialized per phase correctly
Quantity handling clarification:
- The 100 kg entered in PFE:
- Represents process flow quantity, not actual output
- The repeated “Quantity” route postings are correct and expected
- For true staged output:
- Use co-products / by-products or intermediate items
Production order start (critical fix):
- Based on screenshot (Started = 0.00), configure:
- Production control parameters → enable Auto-start
- OR explicitly start the production order before PFE
- This ensures:
- Started quantity = required quantity
- RAF works correctly
Reporting as finished:
- Configure one of:
- Auto RAF at last operation
- Manual RAF step (standard behavior)
- PFE alone does not complete the order
- Work instructions fix:
- Do not rely on route “Notes”
- Configure properly:
- Production floor execution → Setup → Instructions
- Define instruction type
- Attach document (text/file/URL)
- Link instruction to route operation
- Ensure worker terminal/profile allows instructions
- Only then the Instructions button (greyed in screenshot) becomes active
Best practice adjustments for batch production:
- Always link materials to operations
- Use flushing principle aligned with process
- Accept PFE quantity = process throughput
- Start production order properly before execution
- Use proper instruction framework (not notes)
- If phase-level outputs matter → model intermediate products
Conclusion
- The behavior observed in screenshots is standard system design, not an error
- Key root causes:
- Missing operation linkage for materials
- Production order not started (Started = 0.00 clearly visible)
- Misinterpretation of quantity logic
- Incorrect use of route notes instead of PFE instructions framework
- After correcting setup, PFE will behave consistently for batch production scenarios
For a more detailed answer, please provide more information.
Rg,
Alexander
*Due to the complex and different possibilities of deploying Dynamics 365 I highly recommend not to setup the application without some expert/partner or support. (For more information contact me under anassl@inno-solutions.info or visit www.inno-solutions.de)
*The Information comes directly from the manufacturer or provider and are validated (not guaranteed) up to date of creation of the posting.
References:
- Microsoft Licensing Guide
- Microsoft Doc`s/Learn