Hi guy
Thank for visit i have some experience with QAD migration to D365FO
we found 1 challenge about scanning RAF via WMS mobile apps compare to QAD
i have summery as figure below
we could find any standard way to do this it always ask for rescan production order everytime when we report 1 pcs. ( default to 1 )
anyone could help will be appreciate i will send you some beer :)
| Scenario: 1 work order contain 5 finished good item with serial control, require reporting one by one to print label individual using mobile device |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Backflush finished good |
|
|
Report as finish via mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QAD application |
|
|
|
D365FO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Scan work order |
|
|
|
Scan work order |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Serial 1 |
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
Result |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
D365FO more effrot and take more production tag time |
|
| Serial 2 |
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
Re-scan workorder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Serial 3 |
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
Question |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
Re-scan workorder |
|
|
|
How to improve this ? |
|
|
|
|
| Serial 4 |
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Serial 5 |
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
Re-scan workorder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Re-scan workorder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Complete work order and end |
|
|
Report 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
System print label for 1 PCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Complete work order and end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
efault |
