web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Suggested Answer

Double Declining Depreciation not using NBV

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by
I am trying to post depreciation using double declining balance method as of 2/28/26.  When I create depreciation proposal, it is calculating based on the acquisition price, instead of the NBV.  This is resulting in depreciation being overstated.  All assets were migrated on 3/1/25, tagged as 'migrated asset, yes'.  Acquisition date is 3/1/25 when migration file was posted, however in service dates are accurate.  On 3/1/25, depreciation was also posted to record accumulated depreciation on all assets.  Our fiscal year is 3/1-2/28. Below is an example of one asset.
 
Depreciation proposal is 3,496.44 = acq 12237.6 * ddb rate .286.  Depreciation should be 3,190.52 = NBV 11,166.81 * ddb rate .286.  I read one comment that clearing out remaining periods would fix this, however when I try in test this just results in the full NBV of the asset being depreciated.  Any ideas??
Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    Paolo Cecchelli Profile Picture
    360 on at
    Hi,
     
    Unfortunately I am not very familiar with Double-Declining depreciation but I have always seen it in conjuction with an alternative Depreciatio profile of the Straigh Line life remaining type (as this guide also explains https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/setting-up-macrs-depreciation-dynamics-365-finance-operations-joshi-ovjyf/ and MS learn tells: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/finance/fixed-assets/200-percent-reducing-balance-depreciation) but you surely will know better. 
    Another thing that I would do (but maybe you did not do it for a purpose) that I have seen from your screenshot is to change the Acquisition date, setting it to the real acquisition date (if I understand 3/1/2025 is the date of the migration but not of the actual Acquisition of the asset). When I do migration I always set both the placed in service and the Acquisition date to the real ones. But this should not affect the calculation I suspect.
     
    If this does not solve your issue, to help the community investigate further can you please share:
    1) The screenshot of the migration transactions you posted for the asset;
    2)  The screenshot of the Balances of the Fixed Asset;
    3) the screenshot of the depreciation Profile resulting for the single asset;
    4) the screenshot of the depreciation profile settings.
     
     
    Best regards

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Stars!

Congratulations to our 2025 Community Spotlights

Thanks to all of our 2025 Community Spotlight stars!

Leaderboard > Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, AX, GP, SL

#1
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 590 Super User 2026 Season 1

#2
Giorgio Bonacorsi Profile Picture

Giorgio Bonacorsi 349

#3
Diego Mancassola Profile Picture

Diego Mancassola 263

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans