I am trying to post depreciation using double declining balance method as of 2/28/26. When I create depreciation proposal, it is calculating based on the acquisition price, instead of the NBV. This is resulting in depreciation being overstated. All assets were migrated on 3/1/25, tagged as 'migrated asset, yes'. Acquisition date is 3/1/25 when migration file was posted, however in service dates are accurate. On 3/1/25, depreciation was also posted to record accumulated depreciation on all assets. Our fiscal year is 3/1-2/28. Below is an example of one asset.
Depreciation proposal is 3,496.44 = acq 12237.6 * ddb rate .286. Depreciation should be 3,190.52 = NBV 11,166.81 * ddb rate .286. I read one comment that clearing out remaining periods would fix this, however when I try in test this just results in the full NBV of the asset being depreciated. Any ideas??
Another thing that I would do (but maybe you did not do it for a purpose) that I have seen from your screenshot is to change the Acquisition date, setting it to the real acquisition date (if I understand 3/1/2025 is the date of the migration but not of the actual Acquisition of the asset). When I do migration I always set both the placed in service and the Acquisition date to the real ones. But this should not affect the calculation I suspect.
If this does not solve your issue, to help the community investigate further can you please share:
1) The screenshot of the migration transactions you posted for the asset;
2) The screenshot of the Balances of the Fixed Asset;
3) the screenshot of the depreciation Profile resulting for the single asset;
4) the screenshot of the depreciation profile settings.
Best regards
Was this reply helpful?YesNo
Under review
Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.