web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Suggested Answer

Dynamics 365 for Construction - Best Approach for Accounting, Billing and Job Costing?

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 2

Hi everyone,

We’re a specialty contractor currently evaluating ERP options and considering Dynamics 365 as a potential platform.

Our primary focus is on construction-specific requirements such as job costing, AIA billing, retainage, change orders, and overall project-based accounting (GL, AP, AR). We understand that Dynamics 365 is not fully tailored out of the box for construction, so we’re exploring the best approach to make it work effectively.

For those who have implemented or are currently using Dynamics 365 in a construction environment:

  • Did you go with Business Central or Finance & Operations?
  • Did you use any construction-specific add-ons or build custom functionality?
  • How well does it handle AIA billing and subcontractor management?
  • Any lessons learned during implementation, especially around data migration and process alignment?

We’re particularly interested in real-world experiences—what worked well and what challenges you faced.

Appreciate any insights or recommendations.

Thanks in advance!

Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    VC-22010737-0 Profile Picture
    24 on at
    Hi Zara,

    This is a good question, and you’re right to think beyond out-of-the-box capabilities because construction requirements are quite specific.

    I’ve worked on a few Dynamics 365 implementations in construction environments, so sharing what I’ve seen in practice.

    1. Business Central vs Finance & Operations

    It mostly comes down to the size and complexity of your operations.

    • Business Central works fine for smaller contractors with simpler project structures.
    • For anything involving multiple projects, detailed job costing, or complex billing (like retainage and progress billing), Finance & Operations tends to be the better fit.

    In most mid-sized to large construction setups, F&O with the Project module is what teams end up using.

    2. Add-ons vs Customization

    Out of the box, Dynamics 365 doesn’t fully cover construction-specific needs like AIA billing, retainage tracking, or structured change order workflows.

    In real implementations, I’ve seen three approaches:

    • Pure customization (flexible but harder to maintain long term)
    • ISV add-ons (faster and more structured)
    • A mix of both (usually the most practical)

    In one of the projects I was involved in, we evaluated a construction-focused solution from Dynamic Netsoft along with standard F&O. That kind of approach helped cover gaps like contract management, billing structures, and project tracking without over-customizing the core system.

    3. AIA Billing and Subcontractor Management

    These areas need careful planning.

    • AIA billing is not native, so it’s usually handled through either custom development or an industry add-on. It also needs to tie properly into WIP and revenue recognition.
    • Subcontractor management can be partially handled through procurement and project modules, but for real-world scenarios like retention, compliance, and progress-based payments, additional configuration or extensions are typically required.

    4. Lessons Learned

    A few things that made a big difference in successful implementations:

    • Avoid trying to replicate your legacy system exactly. It slows things down and creates unnecessary complexity.
    • Spend time designing your job costing structure (cost codes, categories, posting profiles). This directly impacts reporting and billing accuracy.
    • Data migration is often underestimated, especially with open projects and historical cost data. Cleaning data upfront saves a lot of issues later.
    • Standard reports are usually not enough. Most teams end up building Power BI reports for WIP, cost tracking, and forecasting.

    Final Thought

    Dynamics 365 can work well for construction, but it needs the right combination of core functionality, industry extensions, and proper process alignment.

    The projects that go smoothly are the ones where teams invest time early in requirement mapping and solution design rather than trying to fix things during implementation.

     

    Hope this helps, and would be interested to hear what direction you end up taking.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Stars!

Congratulations to our 2025 Community Spotlights

Thanks to all of our 2025 Community Spotlight stars!

Leaderboard > Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, AX, GP, SL

#1
Giorgio Bonacorsi Profile Picture

Giorgio Bonacorsi 479

#2
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 463 Super User 2026 Season 1

#3
Syed Haris Shah Profile Picture

Syed Haris Shah 236 Super User 2026 Season 1

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans