web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Suggested Answer

Tolerance for Require the calculated totals to equal the imported totals for workflow submission

(5) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 394 Super User 2026 Season 1
 
Hi All
 
We enabled the parameter “Require the calculated totals to equal the imported totals for workflow submission” to validate that the imported invoice total and VAT amounts match the system calculated values during pending supplier invoice processing. However, we have observed that many suppliers submit VAT amounts with minor variances (e.g., 0.01 or 0.02), which prevents workflow submission due to the strict validation. Is there a way to configure a tolerance for these validations, or is Microsoft planning to introduce such functionality in a future release roadmap?
 
We suggested a workaround to amend the variance in imported total VAT amount under the Pending supplier invoice header but we are looking for any configuration to setup the tolerance. 
 
 
Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • SajeedMullaji Profile Picture
    840 on at
  • Suggested answer
    SajeedMullaji Profile Picture
    840 on at

    @Sathish Kumar Palan... 
    No tolerance config exists for this parameter — it's a hard zero-tolerance check. When enabled, even a 0.01 variance between the imported payload and the system-calculated VAT blocks workflow submission. Standard invoice matching tolerances don't apply here.

    Two options. Either the AP clerk manually clicks 'Update imported totals to match calculated totals' on the action pane before submitting — this accepts the imported figure and lets workflow proceed. Or turn the parameter off and rely on standard invoice matching validation instead, which does support configurable tolerance thresholds under accounts payable parameters.

    Worth raising with Microsoft as a product feedback item — minor rounding variances from supplier systems are common and a tolerance field here would be practical.

    If it helps, mark answered.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Season of Sharing Community Challenge Winners!

Congratulations to our community stars!

Women in Power Builds Momentum

Expanding mentorship, skilling, and AI innovation

Congratulations to the July Top 10 Community Leaders

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, AX, GP, SL

#1
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 330 Most Valuable Professional

#2
CU10121822-0 Profile Picture

CU10121822-0 310

#3
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 242 Super User 2026 Season 2

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans