
Hello everyone,
I’m looking for guidance on an inventory/dimension-group scenario in AX 2009 related to improving raw-material consumption tracking.
A significant number of raw-material items are currently linked to a dimension group where Pallet ID is not enabled. To correct this, I’m evaluating the following approach:
1. Move items to a new dimension group (with Pallet ID enabled) after
closing all financial transactions,
counting inventory down to zero, and
running inventory close.
2. For items where this isn’t operationally feasible, create a new item tied to the updated dimension group and gradually phase out the old item.
Because the environment uses FIFO / Weighted Average, I want to ensure this approach does not negatively impact costing, inventory valuation, or settlement behavior.
I also have a question regarding the Primary Stocking setting:
Should raw materials be marked as Primary Stocking when enabling additional dimensions like Pallet ID?
What happens if they are not set as Primary Stocking?
Any insights, best practices, or gotchas around:
changing dimension groups,
costing behavior in AX 2009,
introducing a new item for transition, or
Primary Stocking implications
Thank you in advance for your help!