*This post is locked for comments
*This post is locked for comments
1. If possible, stop and investigate GP Manufacturing. Might save you considerable effort. If your partner will not support this, call me. I can provide balanced analysis.
2. If you go to AX for mfg, go to AX for finance. Keep it Simple!!!!!
Bob,
Currently we are performing a complete GP to AX Migration for a manufacturing client , who needs to migrate this financial & manufacturing data to AX system. Please drop an email to learn more.
MV
Thanks for your advice Ron. You're right, it is too late to use the GP Manufacturing module [I don't even think that was investigated as an option]. I have only recently joined the company and the decision to move to AX has already been made and cannot be reversed.
I am in the process of reviewing and documenting all of the interfaces we have with data going in/out of GP (should have been done a long time ago) so I can investigate how easily they could be replicated with AX.
At the moment GP is not tightly integrated with our manufacturing system and all we do is pass POs into GP, with associated validation of account codes, currency codes and supplier codes. I suspect it would be easier to replicate this interface between GP and AX than to rebuild all of the interfaces with other systems if we move to AX. However, there will be a lot of other benefits to having Finance on the same system as manufacturing (business intelligence, central reporting, fully automated and supported updates etc) which will also need to be valued.
I don't know too much about AX, but it seems to be marketed much more as an ERP package where GP is marketed as a Finance package. I would be very interested if you are aware of any deficiencies or 'show stoppers' with the financial side of AX which would make it unsuitable for an organisation already using GP.
Thanks, Bob.
I'm aware that this may be too late based on your post, but did you folks look at the Manufacturing module for Microsoft Dynamics GP? It can do a lot, and whatever it can't do, GP is very friendly with adding new functionality that your business may need. The only downside on the Manufacturing module is that there are not many VARs that know it well, but we have many clients on it, and have done many integrations with it. Something to consider.
If it's not doable, I think for simplicity sake it would be a good idea for both Finance and Mfg to all be on the same system. Why create integration if you don't have to. However, if you decide to keep them separate, you'll have to decide at what level you want to integrate. For example, will you be storing on-hand (finished goods) inventory in GP? If so, you'll need to create a PO Receipt integration. If you need to also store component items in GP, you'll need to setup and inventory (decrease) adjustment for GP. However, I usually see where components are stored in the MFG system, since their levels are needed for planning.
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing. You can also customize your in-app and email Notification settings across all subscriptions.
André Arnaud de Cal... 291,269 Super User 2024 Season 2
Martin Dráb 230,198 Most Valuable Professional
nmaenpaa 101,156