Share
ReportHello Team,
I would like to ask for an advice as to what approach is best for the process for carcass cutting/re-classing.
Context: Cutting/re-classing of carcass. The requirement is to record the quantity and cost of the end-cuts coming from carcass.
Sample:
| Level | Item Number | Yield % (Ratio and proportion of the end-cuts correlated to raw material) | Qty | UM | Cost | ||
| 0 | Carcass | 100 | 6 | kg | 300 | ||
| 1 | Primal 1 | 0.6 | 3.6 | kg | 180 | ||
| 1 | Primal 2 | 0.4 | 2.4 | kg | 120 | ||
| 2 | End-Cut1 | 0.7 | 1.68 | kg | 84 | ||
| 2 | End-Cut2 | 0.3 | 0.72 | kg | 36 |
You might get confused with the yield but to explain:
Primal 1 and Primal 2 is the ratio and proportion from Carcass.
End-Cut1 and End-Cut2 is the ratio and proportion from Primal 2.
Notice that .6 and .4 is equal to 1 or 100, while .7 and .3 is also equal 1.
The yield is then multiplied to the Qty and Cost.
I made my sample simple but Primal 1 should also be a semi-finished having its own end-cuts.
All responses (
Answers (
181
