Share
ReportHey,
are the mentioned guidelines required to pass the test or are deviations of each point allowed when you provide justifications?
Greetings,
Crym.
*This post is locked for comments
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
Hey,
are the mentioned guidelines required to pass the test or are deviations of each point allowed when you provide justifications?
Greetings,
Crym.
*This post is locked for comments
First of all thank you for the quick answer.
But I got following comprehension issues:
In the section "How to comply" of "3.1. Solution must comply with UX guidelines" stands following:
|
HOW TO COMPLY Observe the following user experience requirements. If your user experience deviates from these requirements, then you must prepare a justification for the deviation. Include this justification in your software submission package. Some requirements are specific to the Microsoft Dynamics NAV Windows client, the Microsoft Dynamics NAV Web client, or the Microsoft Dynamics NAV Tablet client. If not client is specified, the requirement applies to all deployments |
Now in the UX guidelines are several points where they say "A justification can be provided [...]" e.g. in point 3.9 and sub point 3.9.1.
3.9. (Windows client and Web client only) There must be a Departments button to provide access to infrequently used links.
3.9.1. A justification can be provided stating why a specific user profile should not show the Departments button. For example: “The user profile warehouse temp is intended for people in short-term employment who will only be allowed to access the few pages that are displayed in their navigation pane”.
So am I allowed to make justifications for all deviations or only for those points where it is especially named?
If document mention this line then you need to comply the requirement .
This requirement is mandatory. If the solution does not follow user experience requirements, then it will fail the test.
All the best for CFMD
#1
André Arnaud de Cal...
291,391
Super User 2024 Season 2
#2
Martin Dráb
230,445
Most Valuable Professional
#3
nmaenpaa
101,156
All responses (
Answers (
