web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Small and medium business | Business Central, N...
Suggested Answer

What's the best method to adjust inventory?

(2) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 396
We have an occurrence where the warehouse will lose inventory and/or then find it again.

I've noticed if using item journal it's easy to do but then only for negative adjustment does it work well. At the same time, if we do a positive adjustment it does not link to any specific vendor, the incorrect posting groups might be selected, cost history, and audit trail integrity wouldn't be on the same page. Is Physical Inventory Count/Journal better for this? Basically adding items or adding back items is the tricky part I would say.

Thanks in advance!
I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    YUN ZHU Profile Picture
    95,739 Super User 2025 Season 2 on at
    Hi, Item Journal is the simplest way to do this. Whether you are doing Physical Inventory Journals or Adjust Inventory on the Item List, all of them are posted through the Item Journal.
     
    In addition, you are only adjusting the inventory. It is not recommended to re-purchase through Purchase Order, which will result in unrequested invoices.
     
    Hope this can give you some hints.
    Thanks.
    ZHU
  • RH Profile Picture
    396 on at
    I understand. However if items are added in this matter (say lost 50, but the warehouse found 20 next month they misplaced) do those items still link to the original purchased? In my experience they become their own entity standalone (if using item journal) and almost like a writeoff by themselves not linked to the original purchase.

    Please help clarify this part, thanks.
  • Suggested answer
    Yi Yong Profile Picture
    2,569 Super User 2025 Season 2 on at
    Hello,
     
    Let me know if I am understanding you correctly.
    In Negative Adjustment, you can point to the specific entry and reduce the remaining qty.
     
    However, in Positive Adjustment, you can't point to the specific entry and increase the remaining qty. Thus, the Cost History is not linked.
     
    If this is what you are asking, then yes, Positive Adjustment entry can't be used to add or increase the remaining qty of the existing entry.
    It will be a standalone new entry.
     
    You can change the Posting Group and use the correct one before posting, you may need to personalize the field out.
  • Suggested answer
    RockwithNav Profile Picture
    8,637 Super User 2025 Season 2 on at
    As mentioned by You Zhu, this new feature is damn awesome to adjust inventory, its very simple and anyone can adjust it, Have a look.
  • Sagar Dangar, MCP Profile Picture
    799 Super User 2025 Season 2 on at
    Hi,
     
    Item journal is best for positive/negative adjustment of products.
     
    You can try below example according to your scenario:
     
    Negative adjustment: For example, lost 50 items, do 50 items negative adjustment and suppose it's generated item ledger entry No.=242
     
    Positive adjustment: Found 20 items, do 20 items positive adjustment with "applies-to entry"=242 and if you want to link item with purchase(vendor) then fill "source type"="vendor" and "source no."="vendor no.". Additionally, you can use external document number as purchase invoice number.
     
    For remaining 30 lost items, you can do same positive adjustment if found again.
     
    I hope this will work
     
    Thanks,
    Sagar Dangar
  • RH Profile Picture
    396 on at
    Sagar,
    Appreciate your answer it's the closest to what we're looking for. However, it seems that only when we do a negative adjustment whether thru item journal and/or physical inventory journal that it can link the the original purchase. When doing a positive adjustment i'm not able to select anything, unless I remove all the filters, then it brings up perhaps the shipment receipt in Applies-to-Entry. It basically is still a standalone entry in which also we'd have to look up, if adding back to the same lot, what the original purchase cost was as not to keep the costs streamlined. It's quite unusual. Also I noticed that when the client did a negative adjustment using positive adjustment but with negative numbers then it throws off our reporting on the PowerBI side (it doesn't register the actual cost correctly).
     
  • RH Profile Picture
    396 on at
    Typo: as to keep the costs streamlined** since it defaults to the FIFO Unit Cost.
  • Suggested answer
    YUN ZHU Profile Picture
    95,739 Super User 2025 Season 2 on at
    In addition, if the Item Tracking is enabled, you can track by Lot or Serial No.
     
    Thanks
    ZHU
  • Gerardo Rentería García Profile Picture
    25,367 Most Valuable Professional on at

    Hi, good day
    I hope this can help you, and give you some hints.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/adjust-inventory/

    https://usedynamics.com/business-central/inventory/adjustment/

    Best Regards
    Gerardo

  • RH Profile Picture
    396 on at
    I think most of the answers here are showing the process. What's important is which effect achieved is the correct one based on our setup and for what I'm asking. I'm going to assume that because of lot tracking (which is what we use) that the unit costs will be correct over time. However, especially for adding items it's important to reference the original unit cost and not the FIFO cost on item card. Hopefully this way it will keep the calculations congruent if adding items back to inventory, etc.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Responsible AI policies

As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…

Neeraj Kumar – Community Spotlight

We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…

Leaderboard > Small and medium business | Business Central, NAV, RMS

#1
OussamaSabbouh Profile Picture

OussamaSabbouh 2,066

#2
YUN ZHU Profile Picture

YUN ZHU 658 Super User 2025 Season 2

#3
Sumit Singh Profile Picture

Sumit Singh 595

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans