RE: Issues with CALC in MR column headers
I would try a couple things to ‘debug’ the problem.
First, if you are not printing columns B and C, if those columns are set to non printing, I would remove that flag so the columns print. If they are just printing column D and it’s 0.00 or blank, how do we know that isn’t correct? Print columns B and C also, which are being added together to get column D.
Second, I would change the base-10 to just base, and then print the report for the period in question. As an example, if they are in period 04-2019, and they are trying to print a report for period 06-2018 by using a period value of base-10, can they print a report if they set the reporting period to 06-2018 and just print the report for that period with the period option set to base. If they can, if they set the period to base-1 and print the report for period 07-2018, see if they get the same results. Then maybe try it with period 12-2018 and a period of base-7. Then period 01-2019 with a period of base-8. All of those should deliver the same results.
I think though that in this example, if there is no activity for the account for fiscal year 2019, then it might not report the results of a period in fiscal year 2018. As an example, if you print for period 12-2018 with a period of base-7 and that prints OK. Then you print for period 01-2019 with a period of base-8 and that reports nothing, I would wonder whether there is any activity for the account for 2019?
Best Regards,
Jana MacDonald
Dynamics support