I'm looking for the SL 941 form for 2013 where line 5d should be Taxable wages & tips subject to Additional Medicare Tax withholding and line 5e should be Add Column 2 from lines 5a, 5b, 5c, and 5d
*This post is locked for comments
I'm looking for the SL 941 form for 2013 where line 5d should be Taxable wages & tips subject to Additional Medicare Tax withholding and line 5e should be Add Column 2 from lines 5a, 5b, 5c, and 5d
*This post is locked for comments
Thanks Elaine for your answers and prompt response! Much appreciated. You have answered my question(s).
Ver 7 went into extended support in 2012 , not 2013.
And, during extended support, there are not hot fixes for any reason including new regulations.
Since the 941 is just a worksheet, you could enter the correct numbers on the actual form that is submitted to the government. I am not sure what you are requesting as to a link to 941 requirements. I don't have a link that would define any 941 requirements but would expect a govt site to have such.
So you can withhold the extra money needed for the Fed9 deduction but there is no W2 Control tab option that tells this deduction that it is the Extra Medicare Amt. On W2s and the 941 it will be included with either the SS amt if it is not defined as 6a or, with the Medicare amt if it IS defined as 6a.
But, you can go into W2 History and change both the earnings amt and wages to make the W2s correct as I currently understand.
for 2013: Form W-2 changes are not required
Form W-3 changes are not required
For the Electronic Media File:
New specifications have been added for the ‘Contact E-Mail/Internet’ field in the RA Submitter Record in positions 446 - 485
A new field, Employer Contact Name, has been added to the RE Employer Record in positions 222 - 248
A new field, Employer Contact Phone Number, has been added to the RE Employer Record in positions 249 - 263
A new field, Employer Contact Phone Extension, has been added to the RE Employer Record in positions 264 - 268
A new field, Employer Contact Fax Number, has been added to the RE Employer Record in positions 269 – 278
A new field, Employer Contact E-Mail/Internet, has been added to the RE Employer Record in positions 279 – 318
On the screen to create the Electronic Media File, a Submitter Information area is added which includes existing fields on the tab and Employer Information area added which contains Name, Phone/Ext, Fax, and E-Mail Address.
Thanks Elaine, I appreciate your response but am confused....If I am reading you correctly, for SL7, even though the end of life for SL7 is Dec 2013 and there are new compliance and reporting requirements for 2013 re: inc medicare withholdings for over $200K, since it is not a break or fix - it is not covered by extended support, and there is no hot fix or update for this version. If that is the case, and we have clients currently running on SL7 through the rest of 2013, and they have employee(s) that begin exceeding the 200K threshold - are you saying that this is not supported and they will have to upgrade to SL2011 before their next payroll that puts them over the threshold? If not, can you send me the link to fix the 941 requirements for SL7 versions? Thanks,
There have been no updates for ver 7 since Oct 2012 when that version went into extended support. Extended support means that you can get assistance with break/fix type of issues but no hot fixes or updates are made for that version.
Is there a 2013 - SL941update for SL7? If so, can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks,
Just try updating fed9 calyr to 3013 and print the report.
Fed6 will hold total wages. Fed9 should hold only wages > 200,000.
They were initially set up with the tax table scenario, and then we took that out and change it to Fixed Percent later in January. The thing is ALL wages are doubled, not just some.
Isn't the earnded record going to be created regardless of whether they are over 200,000 yet. The system needs to track the subject wages to determine when they reach that threshold.
Tony,
I wonder if your earnded records for fed9 have a subjwage for calyr = 2013. They should not unless that employee truly has earnings > 200,000.
In a couple of instances I have updated these records to a way future calyr so they aren't considered on the report. They could be deleted for everyone that hasn't yet made 200,000 but I rather like keeping records - just in case.
When any employee truly does become subject to Fed9, a new earnded record will be created.
I put these on an SL 2011 SP1 installation along with the March payroll tax updates and followed the directions for Fed9. I get wages doubled up on the 941 for Fica and showing up in the new line even thought they should be zero. If I change the deduction from Fica to All Other then they don't double. Will the new line report correctly in this scenario?
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing. You can also customize your in-app and email Notification settings across all subscriptions.
André Arnaud de Cal... 291,280 Super User 2024 Season 2
Martin Dráb 230,235 Most Valuable Professional
nmaenpaa 101,156