Changes in MR from GP 2010 to GP 2018

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by Richard Wheeler

75,730

We just upgraded a client from GP 2010 to GP 2018. Everything was moved to a new server and we exported the building blocks and imported them into the latest version of MR. The problems we have come across deal with the consolidated financial statements. All the columns show the numbers from the default company. How do we correct these reports so that each column will show the numbers for the respective companies. Simply setting the column restrictions is not enough.

*This post is locked for comments

All responses (5)

Answers (0)

Richard Wheeler 75,730 on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Changes in MR from GP 2010 to GP 2018

That is true. Perhaps doing them individually would work better then one big group.
JoshP on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Changes in MR from GP 2010 to GP 2018

Hello Richard,

You can open any building block and go to File | Save As to save a copy of the building block with a new name which can then be used for testing. I recommend doing this for the row, column and tree building blocks. Then, use File | Save As on the original report definition and make sure to select the new row/column/tree names you created. This will allow you to perform your testing without making any changes to the original items.

Thanks!
Richard Wheeler 75,730 on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Changes in MR from GP 2010 to GP 2018

Two of the companies on the report were part of another tree then the one used for this report. I need a sandbox to play with this as I do not want to break what is now working.
Trenton on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Changes in MR from GP 2010 to GP 2018

Verify that the Tree has companies in the branches that corresponding to the Reporting Unit.
Richard Wheeler 75,730 on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Changes in MR from GP 2010 to GP 2018

These reports have companies side by side with each company defined using the Reporting Unit. For some reason all the columns are displaying the values from one company despite the Reporting Unit being the correct company.