Skip to main content

Notifications

Supply chain | Supply Chain Management, Commerce
Answered

Extending EDTs

Posted on by 20
I'm working toward an F&O cert and there's this study page on EDTs:
 
 
Elsewhere there is a sample question that goes like this:
 
//
 
It appears that D is the correct answer, which I agree with. But I don't understand why B is not an equally correct answer. According to the official learn.microsoft.com page linked above, DERIVED EDTs can in fact be created, and then modified as needed. Here is the exact text from that page:
 
=========================================

Note

Instead of extending an existing EDT, you can create a new one, deriving it from the existing EDT. This allows you to edit more properties than you could edit using the extension approach. This means that you would need to modify the fields using this EDT to use your new EDT.

=========================================

To me, both B and D are correct. So...why only D. Why is B incorrect?

  • Suggested answer
    Navneeth Nagrajan Profile Picture
    Navneeth Nagrajan 1,439 Super User 2024 Season 2 on at
    Extending EDTs
    Hi, 
     
    D is the correct answer as it is recommended to create extensions to existing base components in D365FO. The question states modify properties of an EDT using an extension hence D is the right answer.
     
     
     
  • Verified answer
    Layan Jwei Profile Picture
    Layan Jwei 7,303 Super User 2024 Season 2 on at
    Extending EDTs
    Hi Community member,
     
    The question says "modify edt by using an extension"
    So logically B is not correct because it creates a new one instead of modifying the existing one.
     
    And here's a link for conditions to modify string size of edt
     
    Thanks,
    Layan Jweihan
    Please mark this answer as "Verified" if it solved your issue. In order to help others who will face a similar issue in the future
  • Verified answer
    Martin Dráb Profile Picture
    Martin Dráb 229,908 Most Valuable Professional on at
    Extending EDTs
    B doesn't fulfill the requirement. The goal is to "modify properties of the EDTs". B creates a new EDT; it doesn't change the existing EDTs.
  • Community member Profile Picture
    Community member 20 on at
    Extending EDTs
    Mohamed, that doesn't answer the question. Over in ExamTopics, "C. Create a derived EDT for AccountId and decrease the field size" is the opposite of the item from my post (B) which talks about INCREASING field size, not decreasing.
     
    I still see no evidence why B (above) is not an equally correct answer.
     
     
  • Suggested answer
    Mohamed Amine Mahmoudi Profile Picture
    Mohamed Amine Mahmoudi 9,439 Super User 2024 Season 2 on at
    Extending EDTs
    Hi,
     
    the coorect answer is (D) Create an extension for AccountBase and increase the field size.
     
     
    Best regards,
    Mohamed Amine MAHMOUDI

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

November Spotlight Star - Khushbu Rajvi

Congratulations to a top community star!

Forum Structure Changes Complete!

🔔 Be sure to subscribe to the new forums you are interested in to stay up to date! 🔔

Dynamics 365 Community Platform update – Oct 28

Welcome to the next edition of the Community Platform Update. This is a status …

Leaderboard

#1
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 291,101 Super User 2024 Season 2

#2
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 229,908 Most Valuable Professional

#3
nmaenpaa Profile Picture

nmaenpaa 101,156

Leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans