Hello everyone,
I’m looking for guidance on an inventory/dimension-group scenario in AX 2009 related to improving raw-material consumption tracking.
A significant number of raw-material items are currently linked to a dimension group where Pallet ID is not enabled. To correct this, I’m evaluating the following approach:
1. Move items to a new dimension group (with Pallet ID enabled) after
-
closing all financial transactions,
-
counting inventory down to zero, and
-
running inventory close.
2. For items where this isn’t operationally feasible, create a new item tied to the updated dimension group and gradually phase out the old item.
Because the environment uses FIFO / Weighted Average, I want to ensure this approach does not negatively impact costing, inventory valuation, or settlement behavior.
I also have a question regarding the Primary Stocking setting:
-
Should raw materials be marked as Primary Stocking when enabling additional dimensions like Pallet ID?
-
What happens if they are not set as Primary Stocking?
Any insights, best practices, or gotchas around:
-
changing dimension groups,
-
costing behavior in AX 2009,
-
introducing a new item for transition, or
-
Primary Stocking implications
Thank you in advance for your help!


Report
All responses (
Answers (