web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Supply chain | Supply Chain Management, Commerce
Suggested Answer

Production order costing: Labor and overhead cost not to be included in the production price variance calculation

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 40

Is there a way or setup wherein attached labor and overhead cost in the production order will not be included in the calculation of production price variance?

I have the same question (0)
  • MATTGUO Profile Picture
    22,353 Moderator on at

    Hi,

    For the labor, it is bound with the cost category of route. And you need to specify the cost price and cost group of category.

    For the overhead, do you correctly set up the costing sheet?

  • MsAxapta Profile Picture
    40 on at

    Yes, we're using the cost category and this is being considered as route consumption in production costing. Is there a way wherein this will not be considered in production costing calculation but still be posted to different ledger account?

  • Suggested answer
    Marilyn R Profile Picture
    15 on at

    I am an accountant and we used standard cost.  If I am understanding your question, you want to include labor (capacity) and overhead costs in your standard, but not actually record runtimes in production, only actual material quantities.  You are currently seeing large capacity and overhead variances in your general ledger and you only want to see material variances.

    We have a similar issue where we have included capacity and overhead in our rates but at the time production is having difficulties entering runtimes in the system.  This is creating large capacity and overhead variances, even though technically none would exist.

    In our case, we changed our inventory posting setup and general posting setup (for production), to be the same g/l account (I would use a separate one from your g/l material variance account).

    In Inventory Posting Setup, the fields are Capacity Variance account, capacity overhead account and manufacturing overhead account.

    In General Posting Setup (on your production line), the accounts are Direct Cost Applied and Overhead Applied account.

                              Direct Cost Applied account should be the same Capacity Variance account on Inv Posting Setup

                              Overhead Applied account should be the same as Capacity overhead/Manufacturing overhead

                                                            account in Inventory Posting Setup

    You will still see large labor/overhead variances showing up on Production Variance reports, but they should (for the most part) offset each other on the g/l variances account.   I would not assign the Material Variance g/l account to any of these accounts above.

    I hope I understood your question and this helps you out.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Stars!

Meet the Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contact Center Champions

We are thrilled to have these Champions in our Community!

Congratulations to the April Top 10 Community Leaders

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Supply chain | Supply Chain Management, Commerce

#1
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 153 Super User 2026 Season 1

#2
Laurens vd Tang Profile Picture

Laurens vd Tang 97 Super User 2026 Season 1

#3
Zain Mehmood Profile Picture

Zain Mehmood 89 Most Valuable Professional

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans