GeneralJournalAccountEntry query

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by Ahmed Muhammad Alam

3,089

Dear Experts,

While tracing the code during the posting of "Service Order Line" service type Expense. I am unable to the find the area when system insert into the following table;

- GeneralJournalAccount

- GeneralJournalAccountEntry

If someone have any information, kindly let me inform.

Best Regards,

Ahmed

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)

All responses (11)

Answers (1)

Sort by

syed baber 11,633 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Ahmed,

Check the Subledgerjournalizer class, you may get some idea. If the posting of Service orders is being done using source document framework, then this class is called to insert data in SubledgerJournal.. tables.

Please let me know if you have further queries in this regard.

Thanks,

Baber.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Ahmed Muhammad Alam 3,089 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Dear Baber,

Unable to reach their through Debugging. Can you please locate it. I reached to the class "SMASErviceFunctionLine_Transfer" --> CreateProjJournalLine_Expense.

Best Regards,

Ahmed

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
André Arnaud de Cal... 305,194 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Ahmed,

When AX is posting using the source document framework, the moment and where is depening on transfer rules. You can find the settings in the General ledger parameters. If this is set to asynchronous or batch, it will not be processed during the posting itself. You can try the setting Synchronous.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Ahmed Muhammad Alam 3,089 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Dear Andre,

It's already synchronous mode with summarize accounting entries "NO"

Regards,

Ahmed

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
syed baber 11,633 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Ahmed,

Can you please tell us the reason of finding the place where the records get inserted in GJAE? What are you trying to achieve? May be someone can propose a better solution

Thanks,

Baber.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Ahmed Muhammad Alam 3,089 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Baber,

Actually while posting of the Expense type of Service Order Line "Offset Account" set to other than Ledger.

In the "Invoice > Expense > Voucher"

The Ledger Account field only posses the ledger account.

For Example:

22010600------

and we have required with complete financial dimension.

For Example:

22010600-JED-070704-0101-1145-82522

We have checked the complete financial dimension for the following areas.

- Contract

- Customer

- Project

- Service

- Funding Customer

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
syed baber 11,633 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Ahmed,

So you are not getting the financial dimension information in voucher transactions, right? If this is the case, I would suggest you to verify before posting that the Service order line contains the financial dimension information. You can check this in Table browser to make sure that the default dimension field is updated in SMAServiceOrderLine table.

Thanks,

Baber.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

jasman 1,413 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Dear Ahmed,

if you are working on a isolated developer box/environment you *could* move the Subledgerjournalizer class to run on client by changing the RunOn property of the class in the AOT. By doing this, and deactivating running business logic in CIL you should be able to use the x++ debugger.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Ahmed Muhammad Alam 3,089 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Baber,

The financial dimension at SMAServiceOrderLine is perfect, actually the problem is at

Service Management > Service Order > Invoice > Expenses > Vouchers

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Ahmed Muhammad Alam 3,089 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hello Experts,

Any solution for this.

Best Regards,

Ahmed

Was this reply helpful? Yes No