RE: Variance % - Actual vs Budget Management Reporter
GRG,
Reminds me of a Favorable/(Unfavorable) dodge I tried at my last job. We wanted the comparison of REVENUE amounts between this year and last year to show FAVORABLE when current year revenue was greater than last year; and UNfavorable when current year revenue was less than last year. Also wanted the comparison of EXPENSE amounts between this year and last year to show UNfavorable when current year expenses were greater than last year; and FAVORABLE when current year expenses were less than last year.
This was made a trifle easier because we arranged the Current Year amounts in rows directly above Last Year amounts:
REVENUE Category 1
Current Year 55,000
Last Year 50,000
$ Variance 5,000
% Variance 10%
REVENUE Category 2
Current Year 15,000
Last Year 25,000
$ Variance (10,000)
% Variance (40%)
EXPENSE Category 1
Current Year 25,000
Last Year 20,000
$ Variance (5,000)
% Variance (25%)
EXPENSE Category 2
Current Year 5,000
Last Year 20,000
$ Variance 15,000
% Variance 75%
The SUM rows for $ Variance were computed differently for REVENUE categories vs. EXPENSE categories:
REVENUE current_year_amount - last_year_amount
EXPENSE last_year_amount - current_year_amount
The CAL % Variance rows were all calculated this way:
IF last_year_amount < 0 THEN -(dollar_variance/last_year_amount) ELSE dollar_variance/last_year_amount
Maybe this sort of computation would work for you... though working in Columns vs. Rows could be trickier.
Sincerely,
Steve Erbach
Green Bay, WI