After doing an FRx to MR conversion I noticed that none of the cells that had column placements produce any numbers. What is the equivalent feature of column placements in FRX in MR?
*This post is locked for comments
The Column Restriction in the row definition (Column H), works the same in MR as it did in FRx. If you have a row that is restricted to B, and column B is an FD column, that row will only display in that column. Any other column would be blank for that row, with the exception of the DESC column. The description will always print. If rows are not printing in the columns that they are restricted to, I would suggest checking the Column Restriction (Column H), in the row definition and verify the column letters entered. Then compare that to the column definition.
If you are using a forced calculation to place a value in a column, the formatting has change a bit in MR. In FRx, you could do a forced calculation like this: C=B130. This would place the value from column B, row 130 into column C. In MR, the format would be C=B.130. A period is needed between the column letter and row number.
#1
André Arnaud de Cal...
292,516
Super User 2025 Season 1
#2
Martin Dráb
231,401
Most Valuable Professional
#3
nmaenpaa
101,156
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (
