web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Suggested Answer

BankStatement format Importing Issue creating multiple statements from Single file

(1) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 77

I am working on MT940 bank statement import in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations using Electronic Reporting (ER) for Advanced Bank Reconciliation.

I am facing an issue where a single MT940 file contains multiple statement sequence blocks like below:

{1:F01########XXXXXX}{2:I940###########}{3:{108:############}}{4:
:20:######
:25:############
:28C:145/1
:60F:D######INR########,##

:61:######D#####,##NTRF####################
:86:CITY NAME
INF/NEFT/################/###########/REFERENCE########

:61:######D#####,##NTRF####################
:86:CITY NAME
INF/NEFT/################/###########/REFERENCE########

:62M:D######INR########,##
-}$


{1:F01########XXXXXX}{2:I940###########}{3:{108:############}}{4:
:20:######
:25:############
:28C:145/2
:60M:D######INR########,##

:61:######D#####,##NTRF####################
:86:CITY NAME
INF/NEFT/################/###########/REFERENCE########

:61:######D#####,##NTRF####################
:86:CITY NAME
INF/NEFT/################/###########/REFERENCE########

:62M:D######INR########,##
-}$


{1:F01########XXXXXX}{2:I940###########}{3:{108:############}}{4:
:20:######
:25:############
:28C:145/3
:60M:D######INR########,##

:61:######D#####,##NTRF####################
:86:CITY NAME
INF/NEFT/################/###########/REFERENCE########

:61:######D#####,##NTRF####################
:86:CITY NAME
INF/NEFT/################/###########/REFERENCE########

:62M:D######INR########,##
-}$

The bank splits one logical statement into multiple sequence parts (145/1, 145/2, 145/3) due to transaction volume.

Currently, D365 F&O ER is treating each :28C: block as a separate bank statement, which results in:

  • multiple opening balances

  • multiple closing balances

  • multiple statements being created during import

However, my requirement is:

✅ All :61: and :86: transaction entries should be imported as separate transaction lines in the bank statement.

BUT

✅ The complete MT940 file should be treated as ONE single bank statement only.

Expected behavior:

  • Take ONLY the first :60F: as the Opening Balance

  • Ignore intermediate :60M: balances

  • Take ONLY the final :62M: / :62F: as the Closing Balance

  • Import ALL :61: transaction lines separately

  • Map corresponding :86: narration for each transaction line

  • Do NOT create separate bank statements for 145/1, 145/2, 145/3

  • Treat 145/1, 145/2, 145/3 only as continuation sequence parts of the same statement

Expected result example:

Requirement Expected Result
Opening balance First :60F: only
Closing balance Last :62M: / :62F: only
:61: lines Separate transaction lines
:86: lines Linked to related transaction
145/1, 145/2, 145/3 One consolidated statement

I would like guidance on:

  1. Has anyone handled MT940 continuation sequence statements in D365 F&O ER?

  2. What is the recommended ER model mapping/design approach for this scenario?

  3. How can we consolidate multiple :28C: sequence blocks into one bank statement while still importing all transaction lines separately?

  4. Is there any Microsoft best practice or standard ER approach for this?

  5. Has anyone implemented a custom ER model mapping/format for this scenario?

Any help, sample logic, or implementation guidance would be greatly appreciated.

I'm also attaching a SS that how i get the values 

 I want single statement ID and in that all transactions lines, 
Please guide me, if anyone have solution on this..

Thanks in advance.

Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    Abhilash Warrier Profile Picture
    7,694 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at
    As per the details which you have mentioned, the solution requires some level of setup changes / updates in the ER Model Mapping as below -
    1. Copy the existing setup → Take Microsoft’s MT940 template as your starting point.
    2. Change the rules → Adjust it so:
      • First balance (:60F:) = opening balance.
      • Last balance (:62M:/:62F:) = closing balance.
      • All transactions (:61 + :86) go under one single statement.
      • Ignore the middle balances (:60M:).
    3. Test with your bank’s files → Make sure the new setup works with multi-part statements.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Stars!

Meet the Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contact Center Champions

We are thrilled to have these Champions in our Community!

Congratulations to the April Top 10 Community Leaders

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, AX, GP, SL

#1
Giorgio Bonacorsi Profile Picture

Giorgio Bonacorsi 699

#2
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 582 Super User 2026 Season 1

#3
Subra Profile Picture

Subra 493

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans