Hi
Can someone please advise the difference between
Sales\Routines\Aging (Receivables Aging Process)
and
Tools\Utilities\Sales\Reconcile\Current Debtor Information
Both of them seem to re-calculate against the due date and the payment terms what aging period an invoice should sit under. Does one achieve something the other doesn't?
Thanks
*This post is locked for comments
Great thanks for looking into in such detail. I will only include the routine in month end maintenance as it is much quicker.
Hello Tania
I have thoroughly checked the process of both; Aging Routine and Sales Reconcile Utility for the current customer information. In fact, I found no different in the result regardless of the technical methods used by each one of them to reach the exact same result.
Both processes (which calculates in a different technical method) consider the following primary tables: RM20101 (RM Open Transactions) and RM00103 (Customer Master Summary). As for the RM20101, each of the open transactions is recalculated based on its due date primarily in order to calculate and update (if required) the aging bucket. Eventually, the balance for each aging period along with the customer balance are updated in the master table (RM00103)
Therefore, following the tiny details of the process on the SQL profiler to check the logical and technical flow of both processes showed me no difference in the end result, while the methods of both are totally different.
Please keep us posted in case of any further updates
Your feedback is highly appreciated,
Just in addition to this, the routine takes significantly less time to run than the utility.
Thanks
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing. You can also customize your in-app and email Notification settings across all subscriptions.
#1
André Arnaud de Cal...
291,269
Super User 2024 Season 2
#2
Martin Dráb
230,198
Most Valuable Professional
#3
nmaenpaa
101,156
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (