You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
40
Everybody
please help me.
I have 2 server
server 1 IBM x3950M2
-Windows Server 2003 Datacenter service pack2 32 bit
-CPU :Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPUX7350 @2.93 GHz 2.93 GHz 16 GB of ram (1 Processor)
-Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (RTM) - 10.0.1600.22 (Intel X86) Jul 9 2008 14:43:34 Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 <X86> (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
-Data on Drive C:
-HDD:SAS FRU 146.8GB 43X0825 Raid1
-Run Adjust Cost Navison 2009 abount 6 Hours.
Server 2 Blade Server HS23
-Windows Server 2008r2 Datacenter edition 64 bit
-CPU :Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @2.7GHz 2.7GHz 64 GB of ram (2 Processor)
-Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (RTM) - 10.0.1600.22 (X64) Jul 9 2008 14:17:44 Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)
-Data on Drive D:
-HDD: SAS 6Gb 900GB Not Raid
-Run Adjust Cost Navison 2009 abount 12 Hours.
Perfomance Navision 2009 User Server 2 better Server1
But adjust Cost Server 1 better Server 2
*This post is locked for comments
I have the same question (0)hi,
server 1 has a very good cpu and windows 32 bit as OS. nav 2009 is also a 32bit system. it seems that this comes together better than the configuration of server 2.
windows 64 bit is not optimized for 32bit systems but for 64bit systems.
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (
