In my scenario, after the credit memo number 103495, the next assigned number is 103497, with a gap in between. After that, the numbers are assigned correctly in sequence. However, another inconsistency arises at 103583, where the next assigned number jumps directly to 103585.
Here are some key points:
- The manual numbering option is enabled, date order is turned off, and allow gap is also off, with the implementation set to normal.
- I compared the sequence of postings by reviewing the entry numbers for the posted lines, and they appear to be in the correct order.
- I reviewed all the document dates but could not find any discrepancies or clues that would explain this behavior.
5. First no. series was not closed because i have some document that is yet to be post in the past dates.
Given this, I am unsure why the numbers 103496 and 103584 were assigned, even though the new numbering sequence was applied after September 1st.