Hi community!
We are currently in the phase implementing D365 F&O and our go-live is coming closer very soon. Our system so far has been set up without considering any warehouse management functionality and that is actually still the plan. However recently the question was brought up, whether we should prepare some settings in the systems that would allow us to retroactively implement the warehouse module functionalities at a later stage, without having to setup new items (storage dimension groups) and warehouses etc.. The recommendation given by Microsoft was to simply setup up storage dimension groups as per below from the very beginning, with the explanation as follows:
We recommend the process of start using a Storage dimension group with the "Use warehouse management processes" enabled and then later use the warehouse migration process to enable the warehouses.
It is more difficult to convert items at a later date .
Solution :
Warehouse management should be switched on at the Storage Dimension Group at least, even if the customer is not yet working with the WMS.
Our current settings (as well what we have been testing thoroughly) are as per below:
We have now done some additional testing as per recommended settings provided by Microsoft, however what we realized quickly is that it is not that simple by just adding some checkboxes and enable warehouse management process on the storage dimension groups. There were a lot more settings required such as reservation hierarchies, Unit sequence group ID, Item Model Groups (FIFO reservation doesnt work anymore), etc..During the testing quite a few errors appeared for example, BOMs were not consumed correctly (journals were created, but the components were still available in stock).
Does anyone else has experience with this kind of approach? And does it really cause that much of issues when converting items/warehouses at a later stage to have the warehouse enabled? What I want to avoid at this stage of the implementation, to change a lot of settings without actually knowing what the implications are going to be. Then the conversion of items/warehouses at a later stage might be the better approach.
Thanks for your inputs on recommendations!
Best Regards
Joel