828
i would like to know the major difference between the manager hierarchy and position hierarchy..?
Under which cases we need to use hierarchy or position ,provide your suggestions with an example..?
*This post is locked for comments
Another difference is that Manager hierarchy is based on direct reporting structure only and manager should be exists in the same business unit. Using position hierarchy you can access any user owned or business unit data , just to make sure user has added in lower position mentioned in the position hierarchy.
The other major difference appears to be that Manager tree is provided -- systemuser::Manager lookup field. Position tree is completely implemented by you via position::Parent Position lookup. This appears to logically provide another means of controlling depth.
Minor difference is that you don't have to use the quite confusing term "reports" in explaining the relationship. (Isn't a report a structured view of data rather than a person? The danger of falling into HR speak.)
The major difference between Manager and position is business unit. Manager hierarchy deals when you are in same business unit, where position hierarchy deals with different business units.
Thanks
here are some real time example ,
www.preact.co.uk/.../hierarchy-security-models-in-microsoft-dynamics-crm
Hi Ram Kumar,
Please refer the link below.
technet.microsoft.com/.../dn832142.aspx
It gives you a clear information of manager and position hierarchy with examples.
#1
Mohamed Amine Mahmoudi
83
Super User 2025 Season 1
#2
Community Member
54
#3
dkrishna
6
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (
