Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...

How to stop some functionality in Standard Code in Ax

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by Prasanth

148

below code is the standard code in CustTable , few lines I need not to required to execute(green color lines). how I can do that?

boolean validateDelete()
{
boolean ret;
CustTable custTable;
SalesTable salesTable;

ret = super();

if (this.AccountNum)
{
select firstonly RecId from custTable
where custTable.InvoiceAccount == this.AccountNum;

if (custTable.RecId)
{
ret = checkFailed("@SYS67133");
}

select firstonly RecId from salesTable
where salesTable.InvoiceAccount == this.AccountNum;

if (salesTable.RecId)
{
ret = checkFailed(strFmt("@SYS75284", tablePName(SalesTable)));
}
}

if (ret)
{
ret = CustVendNetAgreementRelationship::validatePartyAssociationNotInCustVendNetAgreementRelationship(this);
}

if (ret && this.CustVendTable::isRelatedToIncompleteWorkflowWorkItems())
{
ret = checkFailed("@AccountsReceivable:CustomerDeletionWorkflowWorkItemError");
}

if (ret && this.isActiveOnCustHierarchyNode())
{
ret = checkFailed("@CustHierarchy:CustDeleteErrorMessage");
}

return ret;
}

I have the same question (0)

All responses (3)

Answers (0)

Sort by

Martin Dráb 239,364 Most Valuable Professional on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!
Please use Insert > Insert Code (in the rich formatting view) to paste source code. It preserves line indentation, which makes code much easier to read.

boolean validateDelete() { boolean ret; CustTable custTable; SalesTable salesTable; ret = super(); if (this.AccountNum) { select firstonly RecId from custTable where custTable.InvoiceAccount == this.AccountNum; if (custTable.RecId) { ret = checkFailed("@SYS67133"); } select firstonly RecId from salesTable where salesTable.InvoiceAccount == this.AccountNum; if (salesTable.RecId) { ret = checkFailed(strFmt("@SYS75284", tablePName(SalesTable))); } } if (ret) { ret = CustVendNetAgreementRelationship::validatePartyAssociationNotInCustVendNetAgreementRelationship(this); } if (ret && this.CustVendTable::isRelatedToIncompleteWorkflowWorkItems()) { ret = checkFailed("@AccountsReceivable:CustomerDeletionWorkflowWorkItemError"); } if (ret && this.isActiveOnCustHierarchyNode()) { ret = checkFailed("@CustHierarchy:CustDeleteErrorMessage"); } return ret; }

Also, please use Development / Customization / SDK category for questions related to development (I've already changed that for you).

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Martin Dráb 239,364 Most Valuable Professional on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Are you sure that it's a good idea? If you delete a customer A that is used as an invoice account of customer B, you'll end up with inconsistent database and customer B will be unusable. The validation looks important to me.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

nmaenpaa 101,172 Moderator on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Prasanth123,

in AX you can change the code any way you like. So just open this class in code editor and remove the code that you don't like. Of course removing this particular code will lead to issues, but you're responsible of the changes you implement. Perhaps you want to check with your team and with your customer one more time if you really want to break this standard functionality.

Also, you can't upgrade such code to D365.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No