Hello everyone,
in a production environment where fixed assets are implemented (1 value model, 1 posting layer) I am considering to change the depreciation method from “Straight line service life” to “Straight line life remaining”. Why? Because I have following scenario which seems to be only possible to solve with “Straight line life remaining”:
- fixed asset acquired and partially depreciated
- change "depreciation periods remaining" to a lower number (ex. from 10 to 3) because I want to fully depreciate the asset before the end of the service life
- when I run the depreciation proposal, the remaining 3 periods should be equal and adjusted to a higher amount than the normal depreciation (so that the asset is fully depreciated)
Could you tell me from your experience if a change in the depreciation method could have any side effects?
Many thanks and best regards
Fjorela
*This post is locked for comments
I have the same question (0)
