Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...

comment code in PurchTable method

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by @rp@n

Hi Team,

I have debugged cod in PurchTable - setAddressFromInventSiteId()

In this method , I like to comment below code for testing purpose

if (!addressSet)
        {
            companyInfo = CompanyInfo::find();

            location = LogisticsLocationDefault::findSimpleDefault(companyInfo,role).RecId;
            if (location)
            {
                this.setLocation(location, companyInfo);
                addressSet = true;
            }
        }

        return addressSet;

How we can achieve this?

Pls give me more shed on this.

Thanks!

I have the same question (0)

All responses (13)

Answers (0)

Sort by

Suggested answer

Bharani Preetham Pe... 3,634 Moderator on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Comment it like you do in general if it is custom code. If standard you cannot comment. Then you can try doing a coc so that you have some value in addressset which skips the condition that helps your purpose of comment.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
@rp@n 56 on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Thanks Bharani,

I like to return addressset to false. through CoC after next setAddressFromInventSiteId() what should i write?

Pls give me more shed on this,

thanks!

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Bharani Preetham Pe... 3,634 Moderator on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

I don't know which method is this and what is there inside.

Basic steps would be to check for this code and find that method and write a coc before next so that you should have some value assigned to this variable like hard-coded or something. So that if condition will be skipped.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
@rp@n 56 on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

The method is SetAdddressfromInventSiteId from PurchTable already mentioned.

The code which I mentioned only like to skip from the method SetAddressfromInventSiteId through CoC that's it.

Let t me know how will acheive this?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Bharani Preetham Pe... 3,634 Moderator on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Please read my earlier comment again.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
@rp@n 56 on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

I know, can you give me one example of sample code pls

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
@rp@n 56 on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

I like to declare flag = false;

If (flag == false)

{

Like to skip the code above mentioned from the method setAddressFromInventSiteId() through CoC

}

Pls give me more shed on this

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

André Arnaud de Cal... 306,303 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Arpan,

You can't skip coding in a CoC method. You can only add additional logic and influence a possible return value.

If you need a temporary change for testing or debugging purposes only, you can relax the model to (temporary) allow overlayering, so you can out comment code as you need. See the next page on Microsoft Learn.

Relax model restrictions to refactor overlayering into extensions - Finance & Operations | Dynamics 365 | Microsoft Learn

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
@rp@n 56 on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Andre, as per my requirement, I have to skip those code . As you said, its wont possible then how can I make this possible?

Kindly give me some solution pls

Pls give me more shed on this

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Mohit Rampal 12,573 Moderator on at

Like
a
(0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!
Hi, You can't change standard code but can manipulate (By pass) it. I tried to create the code snippet for you, please check and let me know if any issues. You need to be aware that if Microsoft updates code in standard setAddressFromInventSiteId method in future, you have to update it in your extended code as well.

[ExtensionOf(tableStr(PurchTable))] internal final class PurchTable_T_Extension { public boolean setAddressFromInventSiteId(InventSiteId _inventSiteId) { LogisticsLocationRecId location; InventSite inventSite; boolean addressSet = false; CompanyInfo companyInfo; LogisticsLocationRole role = LogisticsLocationRole::findBytype(LogisticsLocationRoleType::Delivery); PurchaseType purchaseTypeLocal = this.PurchaseType; if (this.PurchaseType != PurchaseType::ReturnItem) { purchaseTypeLocal = this.PurchaseType; this.PurchaseType = PurchaseType::ReturnItem; } addressSet = next setAddressFromInventSiteId(_inventSiteId); if (purchaseTypeLocal != PurchaseType::ReturnItem) { this.PurchaseType = purchaseTypeLocal; addressSet = this.isDropShipment(); if (!addressSet && _inventSiteId && !this.InterCompanyDirectDelivery) { inventSite = InventSite::find(_inventSiteId); location = LogisticsLocationDefault::findSimpleDefault(InventSite::find(_inventSiteId), role).RecId; if (location) { this.setLocation(location, inventSite); addressSet = true; } } //if (!addressSet) //{ // companyInfo = CompanyInfo::find(); // location = LogisticsLocationDefault::findSimpleDefault(companyInfo,role).RecId; // if (location) // { // this.setLocation(location, companyInfo); // addressSet = true; // } //} } return addressSet; } }

Was this reply helpful? Yes No