You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
Announcements
125
Hello everyone,
My scenario:
BOM item ABC contains item A, item B, item C. Item ABC is setup as Auto - report as finished (Not production module)
SO line with item ABC, when i post invoice the process with BOM line automatically is OK. But when credit note SO invoice, credit BOM journal line does not marking to original BOM journal line.
The result is cost price item A, B, C is zero (not correct). I have to work around marking 2 BOM journal to ensure the exact cost price at closing period .
Can any setup i miss, I want credit BOM journal auto marking.
Please help me
Hello Dolores,
Thanks for your idea, can you give me the link detail of this report.
I have found in https://experience.dynamics.com/ but it's difficult.
I want to know this report and vote to it.
Many thanks,
Hi,
The behaviour is a design limitation of Dynamics. It has been reported before and there is an entry in the Ideas portal, which you may want to vote for.
Kind regards
Dolores
Hi Ludwig,
Thanks for your support, this is my discussion:
=> This is my requirement: BOM item contains approximately 10 items and BOM item is non-stock. BOM item only use when customer order. To convenient, I want my users only post invoice (BOM journal is posted auto).
This is my reference topic: kurthatlevik.com/.../
=> 10 items component is too complex to explode on sales order, I want to show only BOM item. Because my sales order have to show at least 5 BOM items.
=> It’s OK
=> This is my problem, because it’s the receipt BOM component so it’s zero price. But I expect D365 will auto marking with origin BOM journal. When closing inventory, D365 will auto adjust orgin BOM component to make it zero, to equal to credit BOM component (if 2 BOM journal marking).
Note: Marking is the function to mark 2 transaction, it will be adjusted equally each other at closing period.
=> BOM line has the same BOM journal number. If you marking original BOM lines to credit BOM line, D365 will show reference lot id per BOM lines in invent trans (but D365 does not marking, it's the problem)
=> To consume item component, see the answer for the question 1.
=> You can see the answer for question 2
=> No, if the issue trans marked with receipt trans, then they will be vice versa.The problem is 2 BOM are not marked automatically when credit note SO (because credit BOM is auto from D365). Then, user miss the problem and understand that it’s ok, but it’s not ok for the cost price. Can you help me to find out solution ?
=> Yes
=> No, I tried but it’s not fine. As you know, only marking 2 BOM to make it corrected. If receipt price for BOM line is zero (not marking), it makes item cost price wrong.
=> Yes, Only marking function makes cost price right.
Many thanks for your detailed discussion. Please help me to find out the problem. I see this process is so convenient to my users.
Hi,
Why is it that you use a BM journal for exploding and posting the lines of your BOM?
In the sales order lines we have we have a functionality 'explode BOM lines' that does the same.
Irrespective of that, from your last screenprint, I can see that the original sales order and the return order are linked via the return lot id field. The cost prices of those linked sales orders should be ok then.
I don't know for what purpose you use your BOM journals but in the last screenprint, I cannot see a cost price in the highlighted section.
Also, your BOM lines show different lot ids and no relation to each other meaning that they are not 'linked'.
I would like to understand why you use the BOM journals here.
I don't see the necessity because we have a functionality available in the SO that seems to me doing the same.
The problem that you have with your BOM is that they are not marked and that only issue transactions can be marked with receipt transactions.
For that reason, you might always run into this issue.
What you can do is trying to run an inventory recalculation to check whether this helps.
With a FIFO or weighted average costing approach, you run however always the risk that cost prices differ unless they are marked.
Best regards,
Ludwig
Hi Ludwig,
Thanks for your support. This is my step and setup:
Item model group for BOM item
Item model group for BOM component
Calculation group for all item
My BOM
This is my origin SO with item report as finished. Then, I post invoice (without packing slip step)
Auto posted BOM journal
Create credit note SO manually (Order type = Sales order), Action Pane Sell/ Credit note. Then, choose the origin SO to credit note.
Post SO credit invoice (without packing slip step), auto posted credit BOM journal
The result, cost price is not correct. If auto marking 2 BOM journal, at period closing, the cost price will be adjusted by D365. But i have to work arround marking
Hi Nhu,
Many thanks for the update. I checked LCS but could not find a hotfix that seems to be related to your issue.
Can you thus share a screenprint of the original sales order and another one of your return order?
Also can you let us know the exact steps that you used to create the return order?
How did you add the lines in the return order and what other steps have been executed to create and process the return order.
Many thanks and best regards,
Ludwig
Hello Nhu,
Do you have this problem in D365FO or in AX2012/AX2009?
Based on your tags, I would expect that you face this problem in D365FO.
Is that right?
Can you also let us know what system version you operate exactly?
Also, can you let us know if you are dealing with an intercompany transaction?
Best regards,
Ludwig
#1
André Arnaud de Cal...
294,208
Super User 2025 Season 1
#2
Martin Dráb
232,968
Most Valuable Professional
#3
nmaenpaa
101,158
Moderator
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (
