Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...

PO Invoice voucher posted without voucher number

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by D365_Know

Hello I hope to be in the right forum, having an Issue with D365 10.0.9:

In the Voucher Transaction for Purchase concerning the voucher number is missing:

As i understand it right, this is fine with summarized voucher transaction. There are no open subledger transaction, the adm_d365 user is the one who runs the "Batch transfer for subledger journals".

What i do not understand, is why the voucher are summarized.

The summarization is not set in the General ledger Parameters:

And in the Journal settings no summarization is set:

And there is not one summarize choosen in the vendor settings (Prooved by using table browser):

Before the 12. Mai 2020 it was not summarized, from the 12. May it was. The upgrade to 10.0.9 happened a week later, so it should not be the cause.

Does anyone has any idea? Or I'm i totally wrong?

Thank you and best regards.

Martin

I have the same question (0)

All responses (9)

Answers (0)

Suggested answer

SouravDam 11,730 on at

Like (0)

Report

Have you gone through below link already?

https://community.dynamics.com/ax/f/microsoft-dynamics-ax-forum/363266/po-invoice-voucher-posted-without-voucher-number

Regards,
Sourav

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

nunomaia 25 Moderator on at

Like (0)

Report

Check issue 416588 in LCS - Vendor invoice approval journals are summarized to 1 line by date even when there are different Vendors

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
D365_Know 10 on at

Like (0)

Report

Hello Sourav

Thank you yes. I was part of this discussen as was adviced to open a new disscussion concerning D365.

Best regards

Martin

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
D365_Know 10 on at

Like (0)

Report

Hi thats sounds interesting but it may fit not my case: untill the 12. May 2020 there was no summarization at all:

After all are summarized, even thoug i can not find a setting where is to summarize:

When i check the original documents:

And the PO's behind:

They have all the same vendor. So this is not a different vendor problem, i just don't know, why the summaration happens.

But thank you for the hint anyway. This is very good to know.

Best regards

Martin

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

nunomaia 25 Moderator on at

Like (1)

Report

I think that KB also applies to if it's they are same vendor.

From KB : "However, all line with the same date are summarized even though they are to different Vendors."

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
D365_Know 10 on at

Like (0)

Report

Hello Nuno

Thank you, the customer will start to test 10.0.13 soon, so i let them check the process there again.

So may that really solves that case too.

Thank you very much.

Martin

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Ludwig Reinhard Microsoft Employee on at

Like (0)

Report

Hi Martin

To me this looks strange especially against the background that you said that things worked good and different before.

Can you open a support case with MS about this issue?

Best regards

Ludwig

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
D365_Know 10 on at

Like (0)

Report

Hello Ludwig

I not yet, as Microsoft needs reproduction in "clean" environment. It's very time consuming to setup and reproduce sometimes. For me it was interesting, what the community thinks about my settings. I will wait untill the customer does it's tests in 10.0.13, as there is also an interface involved (customization), where they can scan and import vendor invoices. And the fix mentioned by Nuno could be interesting too.

I will post my results here later.

Best regards

Martin

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Ramit Paul 22,797 Most Valuable Professional on at

Like (0)

Report

Hi Martin,

Microsoft doesn't necessarily need reproduction in unique cases, you can approach to them for their advice, they have worked on many cases like this, I also reported one and they adviced to change some setup.

So, I agree with Dr. Ludwig to raise this with MS, if not then it will be unresolved in your version and other customer will face the same issue.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No