Notifications
Announcements
No record found.
I am getting this error when i want to view my source FILE in DMF
Duplicate tag exists in file ''
doesn't anyone know what it is ?
*This post is locked for comments
Hi Abdo,
Did you specify the sample file name in the processing group?
yes i did, and i went to click on "Preview source file" ,
then i got this error ,
i was getting a different error before , which was related to the amount column format, but i fixed that error,
now it is this ,
do you have any idea what it is ? thank you
Does the file itself has a file header? Could it be possible that this file has two columns with the same name?
If it has no file header, but you did setup this in the source data format, AX still thinks the first line it the header.
Either it is a duplicate column header in the file, or it could be the wrong encoding. Make sure you decide between ANSI or UTF-8, and that you make sure the file follows the same encoding. I normally just use Notepad++ to make sure encoding is correct. :-)
I am having the same issue of duplicate TAG exists error. I am using ODBC with select statement. debugging DIEF shows it has duplicate amount of columns. one column keeps repeating after another unique column.
Example: KnownAs, RM00101, NAME, RM00101, CustGroup, RM00101 etc..
SELECT CUSTNMBR as KnownAs ,CUSTNAME as Name ,'MIL-MOODY' as CustGroup ,SHRTNAME as NameAlias ,ADRSCODE as AddressName ,SHIPMTHD as DlvMode FROM [RM00101] as CustTable
I have the same issue like Christiaan.
When using an ODBC source, it seems like DIXF tries to map the table name to a column name. If you use more than one column in the select clause the error shows up.
Has anyone an idea how to solve this?
I have used DIXF with ODBC as data source (to import products) and I have never had this issue. Why do you put "FROM [RM00101] as CustTable"?, you don't need to specify table name in the from clausule, if your table name is RM00101, use as is. You only need to specify columns name just to make it easier (DIXF will match fields using field names)
I was able to resolve this issue with a small modification. the problem is the XML returns additional 3e tag called <datatable>
I will post the code snippet change in a few minutes.
Is this a AX-standard bug?
It looks like this could be a kernel bug.
We deployed a new kernel to the customer-installation (6.3.1000.2578) some days ago and now mapping is not possible anymore.
Could this also be your Problem?
Under review
Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.
As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…
We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…
These are the community rock stars!
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing.
Martin Dráb 4 Most Valuable Professional
Priya_K 4
MyDynamicsNAV 2
