web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Archived)

Posting a partial amount in Nav Bank Rec

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 210

A client with an external payroll company posts a mothly journal to record the payments made by the payroll provider. They journal goes to the correct expense accounts and balances to the bank.

However the full amount of one of the payments did not clear in the bank at the end of the month. My understanding of the correct process would be to record the amount to apply in the field a record the adjustment. However i also understood that it would leave the balance of the entry open to be applied in the next bank rec when the remaining amount is cleared.

Can someone advise on the correct process to handle this??

Thanks

Martin 

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    TWBlaisdell Profile Picture
    on at

    Hello Martin,

    Thank you for posting on the Micrsoft Dynamics NAV Forum.  

    The Bank Reconcilation question is assumed to be the Norh America Version Localized Bank Reconciliation in NAV 2009 R2 or 2009 SP1.

    I think the issue here is that you have multiple checks summarized into one Payment in NAV - e.g. a posting to Payroll Expense includes many checks to individual employees. However, if you don't post each check in NAV to the Bank Account, but rather there is one single summarized posting in NAV from the other system , the system has no way of documenting the detailed checks.

    In your scenario, the system posts one Payment Amount as a total check. Now, if only a partial number of those checks are cleared in a period, then there isn't a clean way to track it.  The system doesn't track the Cleared Amount vs. Total Amount difference in the Bank Ledger.

    From a theoretical perspective, I would think that the process would be:

    1) You would enter the Cleared Amount and process the Adjustment for the difference as a journal entry on the Adjustments Tab. This would add back the amount to the G/L entries Balance for the outstanding check portion.

    2) The Cleared Flag would clear the full amount with the total of all checks but we've added back the outstanding amount to balance the entries. On the Adjustment Tab, we could document which Payroll Document Check No or Nos didn't clear.

    3) In the following Bank Reconciliation period, we would review the prior adjustments and confirm that the remainder of the checks cleared and would reverse the Adjustment from the previous period to balance out to the G/L.

    The challenge is that this is viewed as all one check. Typically, a difference would be the result of something where a manual check was incorrectly input into the system - for example, we post a check for 10,000 but it was written for 10,100 and cleared as such on the Bank Statement. Therefore, the difference of 100 is a permanent adjustment that gets posted to the G/L Balance to match with the Bank balance. We clear what was a 10000 check for 10100 and record the G/L Adjustment to correct the amount for the G/L to correctly reflect the wrong check amount entered in the system.   The check is cleared and we are done with it.

    In your scenario, you may have what appears to be a single check of say 10,000 for all Payroll. Of the 10,000, only 9,500 clears because a separate check is outstanding.  However, there is nothing in NAV Bank Ledger Entries to track this.  We can clear the 10000 by using the Cleared Amount and posting the adjustment for the 500.00 difference added back. However, that one single check posting of 10000 is now closed.  If and when the last check clears for 500, we need to reverse the G/L Adjustment of 500.00 that was recorded to manage the balance difference between what cleared on the Bank and G/L Entries in the previous period.

    These are my thoughts on the process. I hope it helps.

    Best Regards

    Tom

  • Martin Kerr Profile Picture
    210 on at

    Tom.

    Thanks for your reply. Thats pretty much how we proceeded but i though, as there was an amount to apply the intended logic might be different.

    Glad to see the forum is here, I hope to be able to contribute where possible.

    See you in PHX.

    R.

    Martin

  • TWBlaisdell Profile Picture
    on at

    Hi Martin,

    Thank you for the update and for contributing your thoughts to the customers and other partners on these posts.  Your experience is so valuable to the community and I appreciate your willingness to share your experience.  I'll see you at Directions in Phoenix! :)  Have a great day!

    Best Regards

    Tom

  • Suggested answer
    SaiRagavan Profile Picture
    50 on at

    You could create a journal entry to split the full amount to separate lines. On the other hand, also reverse the original transaction (by doing the reverse entry) and posting all on the same date. Now when you re-run the suggestion at the Bank Reconciliation, you would be able to post the partial amount, and leave the other entry for the next reconciliation.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Responsible AI policies

As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…

Neeraj Kumar – Community Spotlight

We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…

Leaderboard > 🔒一 Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Archived)

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans