Notifications
Announcements
No record found.
*This post is locked for comments
Every item Ledger entry has a value entry associated with it. So find out why Item ledger Entry no 3751 doesn't have a value entry.
How/ where should I check this ?
run the item ledger entry page and filter on the entry no and then click on value entry.
Hello,
Have checked the Item Ledger Entries/ Entry No. 3751 does not exist/ it's not there. But numbers 0-3750 are there, then it skips 3751 and continues with 3752.
What could have happened with entry no. 3751 ? it's not recorded there on item ledger entry table.
This Item Ledger Table/ Page
See Entry No. 3751 is missing.
Hi,
It seems like someone deleted 3751 from Item Ledger entry table.
Do you know what entry it was?
Hi Muleso,
this sounds pretty bad. There shouldn't be a gap in the consecutive number of item ledger entries. The root cause seems to be that ILE 3751 wasn't written and commited to the database, for whatever reason. That ACIE is referring to it means that there is likely an item application entry (T339) that refers to ILE No. 3751. Which renders the inventory inconsistent... So, this is a serious bug (as you mentioned). Did you open a ticket with your NAV partner? Just out of curiosity, what CU level of NAV2017 are you using? The bug will likely be somewhere around manufacturing posting functionality.
with best regards
Jens
I administer the DB, I don't have think it was deleted. Seems it wasn't created in the first place.
No CU applied , since installation Nov 2016, no update done.
Its nav 2017.
Technically and functionally no one seems to understand what exactly happened. Could it have happened during company copy ? Several copies have been created by users from the UI.
[quote user="muleso"]Technically and functionally no one seems to understand what exactly happened.[/quote]
;-) I don't know how the copy function is implemented, but it's not likely. Does the ILE exist in the source company? Or is there a gap in the ILE numbers, too? What about the application entry?
On the other hand, a quick check of the changes in Codeunit 22 from RTM to the current CU 07 shows quite a few changes, some are the usual refactoring, but some are error corrections. Maybe worth a look?
Under review
Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.
As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…
We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…
These are the community rock stars!
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing.
