Hi Ludwig,
I was actually putting this together referencing your blog post for AP Accrual over time(part 1), a very good blog post on electronic reporting and a showcase of the functionality!
So for this report I have the root reference, then a child of that as a "record list" then the child of the record list as a "record" with the fields I require underneath.
For the mapping I have mapped the VendTrans table to the "record list" child type. Then I mapped the individual fields under the record node to the fields from VendTrans and the related tables.
On the excel file import the file came through as type "report" and then the table details as "range with the individual fields as type cell.
I then mapped these to the related field for the data model.
Have I mapped the data model correctly with a "record list" type node and then a node under that as a "record" type node?
Which node should I bind the table to record or record list?
Kind Regards
Mark