web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Microsoft Dynamics AX (Archived)

Crazy about colors; costing by dimension combination/variant

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by

I am working for an end user using AX 2009 that has a large number of products with LOTS of colors assigned to each for the purpose of having configurable color selection all over the bill of materials. There has been a noticeably large number BOM calculation tables add as a result of the numerous colors and using "costing by dimension". This is the equivalent of costing by variant in 2012. To get the situation under control I have proposed deactivating costing by dimension combination since the paint, while it varies in cost, is not a key contributor to the cost of the products.

This is where things are getting dicey. The functional users are looking for some kind of middle ground between a single cost and costing by dimension combination. While this is admirable I don't see how it's possible out of the box. I have two reasons for writing this post.

  1. I'd like to know if I'm wrong and what they're asking for is actually possible without extensive modification.
  2. I'd also like to know if the functionality regarding variant costing is any different in 2012 r3 or ax 365.

What I have been telling the end users is that by default the combination cost price is deactivated. With this setting there will only ever be one active cost price regardless of how many colors have been added. If somebody checks the combination cost price and activates then there MUST BE a price for each and every color variant.

The end users are proposing that we set a generic price that is colorless and then create a couple more specific prices for key colors in the mix. Or their alternative is to calculate a cost price that runs the average of all colors and sticks it in a single cost price record. The BOM and route versions offer the ability to create version records without a color that work broadly when a more specific one doesn't exist, but I haven't seen anything to suggest that this sort of approach would also work with costing.

Is costing variants EACH or ALL like I suspect it to be or is there another approach that can be used as a hybrid?

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)
  • Verified answer
    André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture
    301,020 Super User 2025 Season 2 on at

    Hi Frazier,

    Unfortunately there is no hybrid or another option. it is indeed like you stated each color apart or one for all colors.

    1) It is possible to customize the solution, but it is a very risky customization as it would impact the core costing calculation.

    2) There is no difference between AX 2012 R3 and Dynamics 365 in this "costing by dimension".

  • faheem Ahmed Profile Picture
    450 on at

    Difference is between 2009 and 2012.Nothing after that

    daxwithme.com/.../from-items-to-products-dynamics-ax2012

    Not exactly possible what you want but item and item master can accommodate to some

    Extend

    ramdynamicsax.wordpress.com/.../creation-of-item-or-product-and-product-master-in-dynamics-ax-2012

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Responsible AI policies

As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…

Neeraj Kumar – Community Spotlight

We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…

Leaderboard > 🔒一 Microsoft Dynamics AX (Archived)

#1
Priya_K Profile Picture

Priya_K 4

#1
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 4 Most Valuable Professional

#3
Ali Zaidi Profile Picture

Ali Zaidi 2

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans