Conditional (Ternary) causes Operand types are not compatible

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by Community Member

container conResult;
str segmentNameToCheck;

segmentValueToCheck = conPeek(conResult, 1) ? conPeek(conResult, 2) : "";

The string empty causes a Warning of "Operand types are not compatible with the operator. However, I have a string on one side of = and "" on the other and do not know how to prevent the warning from being thrown.

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)

All responses (3)

Answers (1)

Verified answer

XB 1,875 on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Conditional (Ternary) causes Operand types are not compatible

Because values to return have to be of the same type.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Community Member on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Conditional (Ternary) causes Operand types are not compatible

conPeek Function [AX 2012] states that The conPeek function automatically converts the peeked item into the expected return type. Strings can automatically be converted into integers and real numbers, and vice versa. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa618978.aspx

The warning alludes to the "" being the issue. The function gets a Boolean from position 1 and a string from position 2 of the container. If false, then use an empty string. I thus get the warning.

This gives no warning

segmentValueToCheck = "";
if (conPeek(conResult, 1))
{
segmentValueToCheck = conPeek(conResult, 2);
}

Why does conditional (ternary) cause the warning?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Martin Dráb 235,800 Most Valuable Professional on at

Like (0)

Report

RE: Conditional (Ternary) causes Operand types are not compatible with the operator when using a string empty in X++.

Put your conPeek() results to variables. You'll likely find that one of them doesn't have the type you expect.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No