We have a requirement to rename "Work Order" to "Project". Not having PSA installed.
What do you guys think about that? I'm not so happy implementing this because of such a central meaning of Work Order in Field Service.
It would make necessary renaming lots of Sub-Entities.
From time to time MS brings out new Field Service functionality where you always need to catch up also renaming them.
Also with URS/FS I think there are some left overs of PSA (?)
and worst would be if one day the customer decides to add PSA ?? Puh..
Another point: if Users go for searching documentation in Internet it would be harder to find something.
Has anybody done that already, renaming the Work Order, and can share some experience?
Thank you!