web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Microsoft Dynamics AX (Archived)

Adding cost to a production order

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 765

I have a very simple need.  I just want to add a cost of .10 per unit of finished goods onto a production order.  I cannot add to the bom as there is no vendor involved and no part number.  This is just an internal cost we wish to add and it will be specific to the part number (might be .10 for 1 part number and .15 for a different part number).  What is a simplest way to do this?  As an example, if I report as finished 500 pcs in the production order I want to add $50.

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)
  • Fredrik Sætre Profile Picture
    12,644 on at

    You could add a route operation that is auto posted,, but BOM is the way to go.

    You could also add an indirect cost in the costing sheet to a service, but that is mainly based on the base cost of resouces...

    The simplest and probably only way would be to use a service item (Non stocked = no, physical inventory = no) and add it to thr BOM. You don't need a vendor and you part number can be anything you like.

    Create an item called 'overhead' or something, and add it with a cost of $1. Then add a qty pr. required cost amount. Both fixed and dynamic can be used.

  • claganson Profile Picture
    765 on at

    I had actually tried what you suggested prior to this post.  I sent up a product and assigned it the item model group we call NonStk which has "stocked product" and "physical inventory" both set to false. When I put the item on the bom it tells me "An item cannot be associated with a BOM if it is associated with an item model group where the attribute Stocked product is not selected."  Is there a configuration setting somewhere else that I need to change?

  • Community Member Profile Picture
    on at

    Have you considered using the "costing sheet" functionality? It allows you to define an indirect cost based on quantity or net weight or volume (weight and volume have a fixed UM defined in UM master table)

    This costing sheet line is called "output unit based" type and the cost rate could be defined per item group or item

    You can find it here: inventory management > setup > costing

    You need to define cost groups prior to using it

  • Verified answer
    Fredrik Sætre Profile Picture
    12,644 on at

    It must be stocked, but not have inventory.  The issue is the naming of that parameter that is confusing.

    Stocked parameter controls if there should be transactions posted in inventTrans, but that is most for cost allocation. You must use services, make it not have physical inventory, but it require inventory transactions to cary the cost and increase the cost of the item.

    The stocked parameter is used in cases where you need expence items that are not to be used in BOMs or sold.  I believe it was created so that you can use purchase orders for ALL purchases and incoming invoices without having to go through an inventory.

  • Fredrik Sætre Profile Picture
    12,644 on at

    The costing sheet issue is that it is hard to maintain it if you would like small variations between items that are manually defined.

  • Suggested answer
    Ludwig Reinhard Profile Picture
    Microsoft Employee on at

    Hi claganson,

    I agree with Frederik and the costing sheet might be the easiest way. It is not specific for a product but at the end of the day you are making an cost allocation, which is never exact

    If you assign your items to specific cost groups you could specify indirect costs for those groups. This is not item specific but cost group specific and might reflect your requirement better.

    Best regards,

    Ludwig

  • Community Member Profile Picture
    on at

    Actually costing sheet can be item specific when you define rates

    You can enable this feature using the parameter called "per item" on the upper section of costing sheet form 

    This parameter has an effect on CostSheetCalculationFactor table \ form where the classic option item \ group \ all option becomes available, where "group" is linked to item group and not to cost group

    This allows you to keep cost groups agnostic (you can have a unique "cost group" called for example "finished goods") having the "item group or every single item" driving you to the correct "per piece rate"

    Of course costing sheet needs maintenance, though defining "a single item rate" requires an accuracy and time on every scenario we touched

  • claganson Profile Picture
    765 on at

    Thank you so much - this is exactly what I needed to do.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Responsible AI policies

As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…

Neeraj Kumar – Community Spotlight

We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…

Leaderboard > 🔒一 Microsoft Dynamics AX (Archived)

#1
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 4 Most Valuable Professional

#1
Priya_K Profile Picture

Priya_K 4

#3
MyDynamicsNAV Profile Picture

MyDynamicsNAV 2

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans