web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Microsoft Dynamics AX (Archived)

GL segment v/s Financial Dimensions

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by

Hello,

We are planning a major chart of account redesign in our company and I would like some information regarding the best practices with regards to the financial dimensions available in AX 2012. 

For now, we actually record "Sales" in +/- 20 main accounts. Each main account is split into segments between sales category and product. The actual account structure allows us to have more details on the sales done by the company.

For e.g.

GL accounts code             Description 1     Description 2     Description 3

300300400           Revenue              Sales - Category 1            Product 1

300300402           Revenue              Sales - Category 1            Product 2

300300403           Revenue              Sales - Category 1            Product 3

300305405           Revenue              Sales - Category 2            Product 4

300310410           Revenue              Sales - Category 3            Product 5

300310411           Revenue              Sales - Category 3            Product 6

300315415           Revenue              Sales - Category 4            Product 7

From what I understand from the different information gathered is that financial dimensions are analytical fields used mainly to allow a main (natural) account to be broken down for reporting purposes.

My question is therefore, would the best practice in the above case be to create a single sales account and make use of the default financial dimensions (BU, DPT, COS) to obtain the split previously hardcoded in the GL accounts? Or would there be any reporting constraints / data entry constraints in doing so?

For e.g.

GL  code             Description 1      BU                                      DPT                                  COS

300300400           Revenue              Sales - Category 1            Sales - Category 1            Product 1 / Product 2 / Product 3

300300400           Revenue              Sales - Category 2            Sales - Category 2            Product 4

300300400           Revenue              Sales - Category 3            Sales - Category 3            Product 5 / Product 6

300300400           Revenue              Sales - Category 4            Sales - Category 4            Product 7

Also, same logic could apply to Trade Payables / Receivables which are for now broken down into specific GL accounts for the categories they represent.

On a broader scale, would you recommend any means on determining what to include or not in account segments v/s financial dimensions?

Many thanks

JY

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    Ludwig Reinhard Profile Picture
    Microsoft Employee on at

    Hi Jean-Yves Bestel,

    Why is it that you want to redesign your CoA and your account structures / financial dimensions?

    From a system / analyzing perspective it does not make a big difference whether you use the one or the other approach but please remember that making those changes might also have an influence on your financial reports that need to be changed.

    Also think about the changes that might be required for intercompany transactions. That is, are you operating a single company in AX only or do you have also other companies for which those changes need to be implemented?

    Another issue that comes to my mind are situations where some companies that do not use AX yet need to have their data imported into AX for consolidation purposes. If you change your structure in a way that financial dimensions are used and if your companies that do not use AX yet do not know those dimensions, financial consolidations will get more complex and time consuming.

    Best regards,

    Ludwig

  • Community Member Profile Picture
    on at

    Dear Ludwig,

    Thanks for your prompt response. In fact we are implemeting MS AX 2012 in the group. We are at the same time doing a finance process reengineering alongside.

    We will be operating MS AX in the whole group. However, there will be cases whereby for some small companies data imports will be done.

    I was thinking of streamlining the COA but wanted to get some expert advice on the right balance between what to include into the Financial dimensions and what to include in the GL segments.

    Thanks

    JY

  • Ludwig Reinhard Profile Picture
    Microsoft Employee on at

    Hi Jean-Yves Bestel,

    I see. Just put some thought on what needs to be changed for intercompany transactions and how you can import the data from some of your small companies.

    All the best,

    Ludwig

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Responsible AI policies

As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…

Neeraj Kumar – Community Spotlight

We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…

Leaderboard > 🔒一 Microsoft Dynamics AX (Archived)

#1
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 4 Most Valuable Professional

#1
Priya_K Profile Picture

Priya_K 4

#3
MyDynamicsNAV Profile Picture

MyDynamicsNAV 2

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans