15
When preparing more than one payment journal at the same time, has anyone else had an issue where "Check other journal batches" does not work if you select summarise by Vendor? It seems totally crazy that there is a checkbox but it doesn't work in all circumstances? We have definitely managed to create payment journals with duplicate payments.
Hi,
At some point you are correct if Payment Apply against the Invoice it shouldn't show as Pending. But User made only payment Application and Application didn't posted yet so. I think system shows those invoices entries on another Payment Journal batch as open invoice.
Many Thanks,
Manan
Thank you -yes I understand what you are saying, although even if you summarise by vendor, BC should still be applying the entries it has summarised otherwise when posting the journal, all of the invoices would remain open and need to be manually applied to payments - or at least that is what I thought it is supposed to do!
If it does apply the entries with summarise by vendor switched on, then surely the fact that the allocation exists in one payment journal, should stop an invoice from appearing in another payment journal?
It seems surprising to me that I couldn't find any information online that suggests other people have experienced the same issue.
When i test i find the same behavior that you find. And it kind of makes sense that it works like that because when you use summarize by vendor the journal lines are not marked with the exact vendor ledger entry that you will be paying.
But I will do some more testing around it.
#1
Sohail Ahmed
2,655
#2
Mansi Soni
1,574
#3
YUN ZHU
1,453
Super User 2025 Season 1
Share
Report
All responses (
Answers (
