Can a CoC overwrite a standard method ?

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by Voltes

596

Hi guys,

In a standard table, usually there is a ValidateWrite() method. Can we create CoC on this method and overwrite it ? or in other words is "overidden" some condition in the existing method.

Thanks

I have the same question (0)

All responses (5)

Answers (0)

Sort by

Suggested answer

Komi Siabi 13,224 Most Valuable Professional on at

Like (1)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hello,

You can not override a standard method but you can extend it. What you actually do with the CoC is either, you let Microsoft code run first then, yours run after, or you run yours first then, the standard's.

Which ever way, the standard code must run.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Mohit Rampal 12,573 Moderator on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi, You can bypass standard logic by manipulating some code but its not always possible. By override, if you mean to suprress call to standard method then its not possible. If you have a requirement, please share so we can try to help.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Voltes 596 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!
Hi both,

Thanks, yes I have a requirement to suppress the validateWrite for throwing error, replace by Warning only on this part in table RevRecDeferredLine

public boolean validateWrite() { boolean ret; if (this.RecognizeAmount >= 0 && (this.RemainingAmount > this.RecognizeAmount)) { //Revenue to release is greater than remaining revenue to recognize return checkFailed("@RevenueRecognition:RevenueToReleaseGreaterThanRemainingRevenueToRecognize"); } if (this.RecognizeAmount < 0 && (this.RecognizeNowAmount < this.RecognizeAmount)) { //Revenue to release is less than remaining revenue to recognize return checkfailed("@RevenueRecognition:RevenueToReleaseLessThanRemainingRevenueToRecognize"); } }

It has other condition, but I only need to change this to warning only instead checkfailed. Is it possible in CoC ?

Thanks

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Mohit Rampal 12,573 Moderator on at

Like (1)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!
Hi, You can try doing it like this code so it bypass standard code and then you can throw warning instead of error.

public boolean validateWrite() { Amount RemainingAmountLocal, RecognizeAmountLocal; RemainingAmountLocal = this.RemainingAmount; RecognizeAmountLocal = this.RecognizeAmount; this.RemainingAmount = 0; this.RecognizeAmount = 0; boolean ret = next validateWrite(); this.RemainingAmount = RemainingAmountLocal; this.RecognizeAmount = RecognizeAmountLocal; if (this.RecognizeAmount >= 0 && (this.RemainingAmount > this.RecognizeAmount)) { //Revenue to release is greater than remaining revenue to recognize warning("@RevenueRecognition:RevenueToReleaseGreaterThanRemainingRevenueToRecognize"); } if (this.RecognizeAmount < 0 && (this.RecognizeNowAmount < this.RecognizeAmount)) { //Revenue to release is less than remaining revenue to recognize warning("@RevenueRecognition:RevenueToReleaseLessThanRemainingRevenueToRecognize"); } return ret; }

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Martin Dráb 239,099 Most Valuable Professional on at

Like (2)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!
It doesn't throw an error. Calling checkFailed("x") does exactly the same thing as warning("x"). The difference is elsewhere - in the return statement. return checkFailed("x") is an equivalent of this:

warning("x"); return false;

Therefore you would like to keep the warning (no need to call it again) and return true instead of false. But... you should change the return value only if it failed on these particular conditions and no other.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No