Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Suggested answer

Cash Receipts missing from deposits for Check Register

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 75,788 Moderator

Looking at the list below you  will see the differences in which tables got hit after posting cash receipts. The column marked Missing is the one where the cash receipts do not appear on the bank deposit on the checkbook. The first thing I noticed when I zoomed on the cash receipts was that the distributions were missing. That would explain the RM10101 table. Running check links did not fix any of these and before I start manually correcting the missing records I was wondering if scripts already exist to assist in matter like this? Obviously this is the result of incomplete posting. There were three of them posted on the same day in the same batch.

Missing Not Missing
CM20300 No Yes
GL20000 No Yes
PA13100 Yes No
PA23000 Yes Yes
PA23010 Yes Yes
PA23100 Yes No
RM00401 Yes Yes
RM10101 No Yes
RM20101 Yes Yes
RM20201 Yes Yes
RM30202 Yes Yes
Categories:
  • Richard Wheeler Profile Picture
    Richard Wheeler 75,788 Moderator on at
    RE: Cash Receipts missing from deposits for Check Register

    Cheryl. as always you are correct. They never run Paid Transaction removal. I should have said I compared the RM20101 to the union of the GL20000 and GL30000 tables. We are having a meeting this week to discuss my findings.

  • Suggested answer
    RE: Cash Receipts missing from deposits for Check Register

    Hi Richard,

    All cash receipts when posted will update GL and then flow into the Bank Rec receipts table (CM20300).  When drilling back on a deposit in the checkbook inquiry window (CM20200), it will display the receipts with a matching 'depositnumber' from the CM20300 table only.  So if you are missing the drillback from a deposit, first make sure the deposit type is (DEPTYPE) = 1, so is a 'deposit with receipts' type, and then it should display those receipts form the Receipts table (CM20300) with the same deposit number.  There would not be receipts if the deposit type is 2-deposit without receipts or 3-clear unused receipts.  But the CM20300 is the only table the display of receipts come from when drilling back on a deposit in checkbook inquiry.

    The RM10101 is a 'distribution' table.  This table is not used by the ATB or HATB reports, so it's really not a big deal if records are missing from this table, as long as they made it to GL.    The ATB/HATB reports uses transaction and apply tables and not any distribution tables.   Having records in the RM10101 distribution table would just provide a 'display' to the user when drilling back on a transaction in RM.  But that doesn't necessarily mean it didn't make it to GL.  It's not imperative to get the RM10101 table populated, if they made it to GL, unless it's something the client is requesting for 'display' purposes.   Missing records from the RM10101 doesn't affect the ATB reports, so is not a big deal, as long as they made it to GL.

    You said you found over 3,100 records from the RM20101 missing from the GL20000 table.  Be aware that many users don't run the 'paid transaction removal' process to move the records in RM from the open table to history tables, and so they have huge open tables in RM.  But the corresponding year in GL may be closed, so you'd have to look at both the GL20000 and GL30000 tables, and also make sure they are not posting in summary.   If they have been completing reconciliations between the HATB to the GL balance to date, then all records are there.

    Hope that helps,

    Thanks

    Cheryl Waswick

    Microsoft Support

  • Richard Wheeler Profile Picture
    Richard Wheeler 75,788 Moderator on at
    RE: Cash Receipts missing from deposits for Check Register

    I just compared the RM20101 table to the GL20000 using the ORDOCNUM AND DOCNUMBER fields and there are over 3,100 mismatches. Many of these have BCHSOURC as XRM_Cash or XRM_Sales and the batch number is the user's name in lower case letters. I will start working on scripts to correct the ledger and start inquiry as to why this has not been noticed before now.

  • Richard Wheeler Profile Picture
    Richard Wheeler 75,788 Moderator on at
    RE: Cash Receipts missing from deposits for Check Register

    By the way, missing No means no records existed in the table. So there were no records in the RM10101 table for the cash receipts that were missing from the deposits.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Announcing Our 2025 Season 1 Super Users!

A new season of Super Users has arrived, and we are so grateful for the daily…

Vahid Ghafarpour – Community Spotlight

We are excited to recognize Vahid Ghafarpour as our February 2025 Community…

Tip: Become a User Group leader!

Join the ranks of valued community UG leaders

Leaderboard

#1
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 292,516 Super User 2025 Season 1

#2
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 231,387 Most Valuable Professional

#3
nmaenpaa Profile Picture

nmaenpaa 101,156

Leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans