Why both?
ParmId is initialized using NumberSeq::newGetNum(CompanyInfo::numRefParmId()).num().
TableRefId is initialized using FormLetter::getTableRef().
Both columns get their value from the same number sequence. SalesParmLine gets its values from SalesParmTable. We're burning twice the numbers for aparently no gain. Why did MS add TableRefId, which is not a table ID, to the Parm tables?
*This post is locked for comments
I am not stuck. I simply could not figure out why MS would do this.
As far as i know Ax handles the saved (On Hold) invoices from TableRefId field.
could u tell me what you want to achieve and where you stuck ?
Stay up to date on forum activity by subscribing. You can also customize your in-app and email Notification settings across all subscriptions.
André Arnaud de Cal... 290,912 Super User 2024 Season 2
Martin Dráb 229,355 Most Valuable Professional
nmaenpaa 101,156